Re: Bug#985556: flatpak/1.2.5-0+deb10u4 FTBFS on i386

2021-03-22 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2021-03-21 12:15, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 20.03.21 13:32, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 09:16:45 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:12:39AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > >>> Could x86-conova-01.debian.org be an IPv6-only buildd? > > ... > >>>

Re: Bug#985556: flatpak/1.2.5-0+deb10u4 FTBFS on i386

2021-03-21 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: retitle -1 flatpak/1.2.5-0+deb10u4 FTBFS on IPv6-only buildds Control: reassign -1 glib2.0 2.50.0-1 Control: affects -1 + flatpak Control: severity -1 important Control: close -1 2.63.1-1 On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 12:15:15 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > I have commented out stretch and buster

Re: Bug#985556: flatpak/1.2.5-0+deb10u4 FTBFS on i386

2021-03-21 Thread Philipp Kern
On 20.03.21 13:32, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 09:16:45 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:12:39AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: >>> Could x86-conova-01.debian.org be an IPv6-only buildd? > ... >>> Or, if not that, could it be the case that this build

Re: Bug#985556: flatpak/1.2.5-0+deb10u4 FTBFS on i386

2021-03-20 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 09:16:45 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:12:39AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Could x86-conova-01.debian.org be an IPv6-only buildd? If so, this > > reminds me of https://bugs.debian.org/948834 and is perhaps even the > > same bug > > JFTR,

Re: Bug#985556: flatpak/1.2.5-0+deb10u4 FTBFS on i386

2021-03-20 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 09:16:45 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:12:39AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Could x86-conova-01.debian.org be an IPv6-only buildd? ... > > Or, if not that, could it be the case that this buildd is firewalled or > > otherwise restricted su

Re: Bug#985556: flatpak/1.2.5-0+deb10u4 FTBFS on i386

2021-03-20 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Simon, Thank you! On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:12:39AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 22:48:33 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > While reviewing the current uploads for the upcoming point release I > > noticed that the i386 build of flatpak was apparently not done, an

Re: Bug#985556: flatpak/1.2.5-0+deb10u4 FTBFS on i386

2021-03-19 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 22:48:33 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > While reviewing the current uploads for the upcoming point release I > noticed that the i386 build of flatpak was apparently not done, and > indeed it failed. > > Attached are two build logs. The failing test runs a simple Pyth