Bug#972253: samba was forgotten for py3.9

2020-11-21 Thread Mathieu Parent
Le sam. 21 nov. 2020 à 07:46, Graham Inggs a écrit : > > Hi Mathieu > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 22:39, Mathieu Parent wrote: > > SInce 14h 10m! Oh wait ;-) > > I did :) and have scheduled the binNMUs for samba now. > > I'm not sure if you've noticed, but ceph is in quite a bad state. Is > it

Bug#972253: samba was forgotten for py3.9

2020-11-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Mathieu On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 22:39, Mathieu Parent wrote: > SInce 14h 10m! Oh wait ;-) I did :) and have scheduled the binNMUs for samba now. I'm not sure if you've noticed, but ceph is in quite a bad state. Is it possible to build samba without it? Regards Graham

Bug#972253: samba was forgotten for py3.9

2020-11-20 Thread Mathieu Parent
Le ven. 20 nov. 2020 à 21:36, Matthias Klose a écrit : > > On 11/20/20 9:33 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 11/20/20 9:13 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It looks like samba was forgotten by the binNMU request. > >> > >> See https://bugs.debian.org/975330 > >> > >> Can you schedule t

Bug#972253: samba was forgotten for py3.9

2020-11-20 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/20/20 9:33 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 11/20/20 9:13 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It looks like samba was forgotten by the binNMU request. >> >> See https://bugs.debian.org/975330 >> >> Can you schedule that? > > no, according to > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/pyt

Bug#972253: samba was forgotten for py3.9

2020-11-20 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/20/20 9:13 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like samba was forgotten by the binNMU request. > > See https://bugs.debian.org/975330 > > Can you schedule that? no, according to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.9-default.html ldb ftbfs on s390x.

Bug#972253: samba was forgotten for py3.9

2020-11-20 Thread Mathieu Parent
Hi, It looks like samba was forgotten by the binNMU request. See https://bugs.debian.org/975330 Can you schedule that? Thanks -- Mathieu Parent