Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020, at 01:27, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Andrej,
>
> Andrej Shadura (2020-05-03):
> > I’m proposing to upload an upstream patch fixing an index corruption
> > in borgbackup leading to a data loss, see #953615.
>
> I know stretch is about to get archived, but I was wonderin
Hi Andrej,
Andrej Shadura (2020-05-03):
> I’m proposing to upload an upstream patch fixing an index corruption
> in borgbackup leading to a data loss, see #953615.
I know stretch is about to get archived, but I was wondering whether it
would make sense to upload either 1.1.9-2~bpo9+2 or 1.1.9-2+
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #959661 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package borgbackup/1.1.9-2+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
959661: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959661
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2020-05-03 at 17:25 +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> I’m proposing to upload an upstream patch fixing an index corruption
> in borgbackup leading to a data loss, see #953615.
>
> Please find the attached debdiff for more details.
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Ada
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I’m proposing to upload an upstream patch fixing an index corruption in
borgbackup leading to a data loss, see #953615.
Please
5 matches
Mail list logo