On 22/04/2020 11:16, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/21/20 11:32 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 09/04/2020 11:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2020 06:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 4/6/20 12:54 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> hdf5 is currently blocked f
On 4/24/20 6:52 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/22/20 11:16 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 4/21/20 11:32 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2020 11:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 09/04/2020 06:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/6/20 12:54 PM, Emilio P
On 4/22/20 11:16 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/21/20 11:32 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 09/04/2020 11:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2020 06:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 4/6/20 12:54 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> hdf5 is currently blocked f
On 4/21/20 11:32 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 09/04/2020 11:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 09/04/2020 06:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 4/6/20 12:54 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
hdf5 is currently blocked from migrating to testing on mpich due to
#954244.
On 4/21/20 11:32 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 09/04/2020 11:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 09/04/2020 06:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 4/6/20 12:54 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
hdf5 is currently blocked from migrating to testing on mpich due to
#954244.
On 09/04/2020 06:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/6/20 12:54 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> hdf5 is currently blocked from migrating to testing on mpich due to #954244.
>
> mpich migrated to testing. hdf5 will need some help to migrate, not all
> bad rdeps will be autoremoved eventual
On 4/6/20 12:54 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> hdf5 is currently blocked from migrating to testing on mpich due to #954244.
mpich migrated to testing. hdf5 will need some help to migrate, not all
bad rdeps will be autoremoved eventually.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88
On 06/04/2020 12:53, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/6/20 1:43 PM, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> There is a fix for #954244 in experimental but I there are other more
>> serious problems with mpich-3.4a4-2
>>
> Can't mpich in unstable be reverted to 3.3.3 which built successfully?
Yes, it coul
On 4/6/20 1:43 PM, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> There is a fix for #954244 in experimental but I there are other more
> serious problems with mpich-3.4a4-2
>
> Upstream quietly reset the soversion to 0 (as its an alpha package). The
> code works but any users of libmpich12 break.
>
> 3.4 when rele
Hi,
There is a fix for #954244 in experimental but I there are other more
serious problems with mpich-3.4a4-2
Upstream quietly reset the soversion to 0 (as its an alpha package). The
code works but any users of libmpich12 break.
3.4 when released will bump the soversion (it drops some symbols).
On 28/03/2020 10:50, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 27/03/2020 à 13:29 :
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 22/03/2020 12:19, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags:
Some intervention for gdal on s390x may be needed, it's stuck in
Maybe-Successful state blocking the rebuild of its rdeps. The log seems
to indicate that the build was indeed successful.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F1
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 27/03/2020 à 13:29 :
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 22/03/2020 12:19, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Hi Release Team,
>>
>> I'd like to t
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 22/03/2020 12:19, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi Release Team,
>
> I'd like to transition hdf5 1.10.6+repack-1~exp5 currently sitting in
> experimen
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #954654 [release.debian.org] transition: hdf5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
954654: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954654
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Release Team,
I'd like to transition hdf5 1.10.6+repack-1~exp5 currently sitting in
experimental.
Among the 112 tested reverse depend
16 matches
Mail list logo