Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #947165 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
947165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947165
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi,
On 03-01-2020 07:56, Paul Gevers wrote:
> We currently have a bit much transitions going on (and some backslash
> from a piuparts bug), so I'd like to get a bit of those transitions off
> the table before starting this one.
>
> I'll let you know, probably in a week
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
> They build-depend on llvm/clang, not sure whether they are actually part
> of the transition.
I worked a bit on the tracker page and I think it has a better view of
what is involved (basically limiting "Affected" to the -dev packages
from llvm-defaults).
We cu
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #947165 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
947165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947165
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 10:43:11AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> > Besides rustc, it should not have an impact on rust.
>
> But rustc is having issues migrating, so this is something I am worried
> about.
rustc hardcodes the llvm version (and already uses 9),
so rustc is not part of this trans
Hi Sylvestre,
On 27-12-2019 10:46, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> But rustc is having issues migrating, so this is something I am worried
>> about. Also, do you understand why rust-bindgen and rust-clang-sys are
>> mentioned in the tracker? I looked *briefly* but didn't spot the
>> connection yet.
>
>
Le 27/12/2019 à 10:43, Paul Gevers a écrit :
What happens if rebuilt packages don't migrate to testing? I'm
seeing rust package in the picture
Besides rustc, it should not have an impact on rust.
But rustc is having issues migrating, so this is something I am worried
about. Also, do you und
Hi Sylvestre,
On 26-12-2019 22:18, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Just to get it clear, this is only switching the default from 8 to 9,
>> right?
> And rebuild packages to depend on -9.
Sure; for those that don't hard-code the version.
>> What happens if rebuilt packages don't migrate to testing? I'
Le 26/12/2019 à 21:40, Paul Gevers a écrit :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sylvestre,
On 22-12-2019 11:57, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
LLVM 9.0.1 has just been released. I am not planning to spend significant time
on the -8 branch.
It is therefor time to move to the version 9
Just to get it clea
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sylvestre,
On 22-12-2019 11:57, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> LLVM 9.0.1 has just been released. I am not planning to spend significant
> time on the -8 branch.
> It is therefor time to move to the version 9
Just to get it clear, this is only switching the default from 8
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #947165 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
947165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947165
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
LLVM 9.0.1 has just been released. I am not planning to spend significant time
on the -8 branch.
It is therefor time to move to the version 9
Thanks,
Sylvestre
Ben file:
titl
12 matches
Mail list logo
