Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 894913
Bug #894342 [release.debian.org] transition: kdepim
894342 was blocked by: 893515 894818
894342 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 894342: 894913
--
894342: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894342
Debian Bug Trac
Control: block -1 by 894913
Hey,
anbe found a missing breaks/replaces this time with -dev packages (# 894913).
I uploaded a fixed kapptemplate and Akonadi, so users can install both. And
add a breaks/replace to Akonadi.
hefee
--
On Mittwoch, 4. April 2018 15:49:27 CEST Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 04/04/18 15:12, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> Hey,
>
> everything has been rebuilt and the transition is mostly green.
>
> I don't know if the transition will enter testing successfully without
> requesting RM for libkolab before. libkolab is dead, so RM for sid and
> testing
> is suitable. But as
Hey,
everything has been rebuilt and the transition is mostly green.
I don't know if the transition will enter testing successfully without
requesting RM for libkolab before. libkolab is dead, so RM for sid and testing
is suitable. But as libkolab is currently needed for kdepim-runtime 17.08.3
Hey,
Thanks a lot!
> BTW I had to fix all your commands because of the bad versions... Next time
> try to get them right, or don't specify the version at all (it's optional).
sorry - I do not have written a lot of them. But I thought I need to specify a
version, as in the docu[1] it is not ment
On 02/04/18 00:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/04/18 16:14, Sandro Knauß wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> after uploading kdepim, the buildds had built KDE Pim 17.12.3 successfully
>> for amd64 and i386 (other archs are still building).
>>
>> Now we needs some binNMUs. I don't know, do I need to use
On 01/04/18 16:14, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> Hey,
>
> after uploading kdepim, the buildds had built KDE Pim 17.12.3 successfully
> for amd64 and i386 (other archs are still building).
>
> Now we needs some binNMUs. I don't know, do I need to use a separate bug for
> those requests or is it the corr
Hey,
after uploading kdepim, the buildds had built KDE Pim 17.12.3 successfully for
amd64 and i386 (other archs are still building).
Now we needs some binNMUs. I don't know, do I need to use a separate bug for
those requests or is it the correct way to file the wb actions just here inside
the
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 29/03/18 12:45, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> KDE Pim 17.12 has updated ist API and ABI, that makes it nessasary to bump
> some ABIs. To track those ABI b
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #894342 [release.debian.org] transition: kdepim
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
894342: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894342
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
KDE Pim 17.12 has updated ist API and ABI, that makes it nessasary to bump
some ABIs. To track those ABI breakages, we updated the package names to
5abi1. So far most of the packages, tha
11 matches
Mail list logo
