> > As with LXC, I wonder if you would be OK with accepting the latest LXCFS
> > stable release into Stretch at this point in time.
> > The patch is not as huge (7 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 61
> > deletions(-)) and the reasoning is very much the same: having the best
> > possible base for S
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #862470 [release.debian.org] (pre-approval) unblock: lxcfs/2.0.7-1
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
862470: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Evgeni Golov:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> As with LXC, I wonder if you would be OK with accepting the latest LXCFS
> stable release into Stretch
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
As with LXC, I wonder if you would be OK with accepting the latest LXCFS
stable release into Stretch at this point in time.
The patch is not as huge (7 files changed, 100
4 matches
Mail list logo