Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> that's because Thomas overwrote my NMU with another upload, please give
> me some time to talk with him
Thomas added my changes back, all 3 OpenStack packages have ">="
dependency only (no "<<" anymore)
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #856610 [release.debian.org] unblock: sqlalchemy/1.1.5+ds1-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
856610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
[Niels Thykier, 2017-04-03]
> > unblock sqlalchemy/1.1.5+ds1-1
> > unblock murano/1:3.0.0-3.1
> > unblock ceilometer/1:7.0.1-1.1
> > unblock mistral/3.0.0-2
> >
>
> I cannot exactly say I am trilled with this change. But starting from
> the bottom, something is definitely wrong. AFAICT, the lat
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Piotr Ożarowski:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package sqlalchemy 1.1 - it was in unstable for a very
> long time and was my plan to ship it in Strech since the first
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #856610 [release.debian.org] unblock: sqlalchemy/1.1.5+ds1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
856610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
FYI: I plan to upload sqlalchemy 1.1.6+ds1-1 (i.e. a new upstream
release in 1.1.X series). I assume if you will allow 1.1.5, then there's
no reason to not allow 1.1.6 - i.e. next bug fix release in 1.1 series.
Note that upstream already started working on 1.2 series which I'm not
considering for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sqlalchemy 1.1 - it was in unstable for a very
long time and was my plan to ship it in Strech since the first beta
release of 1.1.0. Upstream author provides best unit
7 matches
Mail list logo
