Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-02-26):
> Needs approval from d-i RM. Debdiff:
>
> > diff -Nru wpa-2.5-2+v2.4/debian/changelog wpa-2.4/debian/changelog
> > --- wpa-2.5-2+v2.4/debian/changelog 2016-09-14 11:11:05.0 +0200
> > +++ wpa-2.4/debian/changelog2017-02-20 11:55:12.0 +0100
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:08:51PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 20/02/17 08:18, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >> Please upload a targeted fix to unstable.
>
> I have thought about this a bit more. Even though I don't really like
> the epoch idea, it's an opportunity to clean up the package version
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:08:51PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 20/02/17 08:18, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >> Please upload a targeted fix to unstable.
>
> I have thought about this a bit more. Even though I don't really like
> the epoch idea, it's an oppo
On 20/02/17 08:18, Andrew Shadura wrote:
>> Please upload a targeted fix to unstable.
I have thought about this a bit more. Even though I don't really like
the epoch idea, it's an opportunity to clean up the package version a
bit (1:2.4-1 instead of 2.5-2+v2.4-4stretch1, or even 2:2.4-1 to
accommo
On 20/02/17 00:08, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> We really, really want to avoid going through t-p-u if at all possible. In
> this case, there doesn't seem to be a real issue with doing a revert in
> unstable. There isn't really any point in having a version in unstable that
> isn't meant for testing. The
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:33:32PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > Please unblock package wpa.
> > This fix has to go through testing-proposed-updates.
>
> Why? Is there any reason you can't just revert the vers
On 19 Feb 2017 23:15, "Ivo De Decker" wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Please unblock package wpa.
> This fix has to go through testing-proposed-updates.
Why? Is there any reason you can't just revert the version in
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Please unblock package wpa.
> This fix has to go through testing-proposed-updates.
Why? Is there any reason you can't just revert the version in unstable? That
way we don't have to push a new
On 14/02/17 17:25, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> This fix has to go through testing-proposed-updates.
>
> Thanks for considering.
>
> unblock wpa/2.5-2+v2.4-4stretch1
Sorry, the debdiff I attached was made against a never released version
of the package (differing only in the version number). Attachin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package wpa.
wpa-supplicant 2.6 brought some regressions making it unfit for stretch,
so I decided to keep 2.4 in testing. Ho
10 matches
Mail list logo
