Bug#854905: nmu: petsc_3.7.5+dfsg1-4

2017-02-19 Thread Drew Parsons
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:12:23 +0800 Drew Parsons wrote: >  > petsc 3.7.5+dfsg1-4 has now hit testing. >  Hi again. There's some discussion on what to do about openmpi in testing (#855217). Regardless of how we resolve that, can I affirmatively request we trigger the binNMU for petsc?   This is

Bug#854905: nmu: petsc_3.7.5+dfsg1-4

2017-02-15 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 20:16:06 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >  > > A binNMU seems to be sufficient here. > >  > > nmu petsc_3.7.5+dfsg1-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with openmpi 2.0.2" >  > We should probably wait until petsc migrates, and then maybe not do this unless > we unblock open

Bug#854905: nmu: petsc_3.7.5+dfsg1-4

2017-02-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 14/02/17 23:36, James Clarke wrote: > You forgot to Cc control@bugs.d.o :) I Bcc'ed it :P Emilio

Bug#854905: nmu: petsc_3.7.5+dfsg1-4

2017-02-14 Thread James Clarke
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 854905 nmu thanks On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org > usertag 854905 nmu > thanks > > On 11/02/17 21:41, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Control: reassign -1 release.debia

Bug#854905: nmu: petsc_3.7.5+dfsg1-4

2017-02-12 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 854905 nmu thanks On 11/02/17 21:41, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org > Control: retitle -1 nmu: petsc_3.7.5+dfsg1-4 > Control: severity -1 normal > Control: tags -1 - sid > Control: affects -1 libpetsc3.7.5-dev You f