Hi again,
Cyril Brulebois (2017-02-10):
> Whatever release team members prefer I'll give -3 a try within d-i to
> check there's no surprises with a casual installation, and I'll update
> this bug report once I've done so.
Tests within d-i with -3 look OK: creating an ext4 root partition on a
ful
Hi,
Theodore Ts'o (2017-02-08):
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:34:09PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >
> > This seems fine to me, unblocked. Cc'ing debian-boot@/Cyril for the
> > udeb unblock.
>
> Hi, I've since found a regression that I would like to fix via a
> cherry pick from upstrea
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:34:09PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> This seems fine to me, unblocked. Cc'ing debian-boot@/Cyril for the udeb
> unblock.
>
Hi, I've since found a regression that I would like to fix via a
cherry pick from upstream. The e2fsprogs/1.43.4-2 package hasn't
tra
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2017-02-03):
> This seems fine to me, unblocked. Cc'ing debian-boot@/Cyril for the
> udeb unblock.
No objections in principle, but it'd be nice to have d-i tested against
the latest version. Will try to look into it over the next few days.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Descripti
On 01/02/17 04:48, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package e2fsprogs
>
> 1.43.4 is the new upstream version of e2fsprogs which fixes a RC bug
> (#840733: e2fsprogs contai
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package e2fsprogs
1.43.4 is the new upstream version of e2fsprogs which fixes a RC bug
(#840733: e2fsprogs contains non-free file). n.b., the non-free file is
only used in a
6 matches
Mail list logo
