Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #843133 [release.debian.org] transition: poco
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
843133: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843133
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 04/11/16 11:26, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2016-11-04 09:24]:
>> Do the rdeps build fine with the new version? Particularly note the recent
>> boost
>> 1.62 change, which affects a bunch of the rdeps.
>
> I tested all without problems (us
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2016-11-04 09:24]:
> Do the rdeps build fine with the new version? Particularly note the recent
> boost
> 1.62 change, which affects a bunch of the rdeps.
I tested all without problems (using Boost 1.62), except gpsshogi which
FTBFS with gcc6 (#811689) and is flagged fo
On 04/11/16 09:03, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to transition poco as it's tagged autorm and a number of my
> packages depend on it.
Do the rdeps build fin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I would like to transition poco as it's tagged autorm and a number of my
packages depend on it.
Ben file:
title = "poco";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libpoco*9v5" | .depends ~ "libpo
5 matches
Mail list logo