"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> For the record, I retried the build this evening with an explicit
> dependency on the new glibc version (as otherwise it won't get
> automagically upgraded in the chroot) and it built successfully.
Excellent.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 08:20 -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>
> > That glibc version got accepted last night, so hopefully we'll be in a
> > position to retry the guile-2.0 build later on.
>
> Great. Please let me know if I can help further.
For the record, I retried the
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> That glibc version got accepted last night, so hopefully we'll be in a
> position to retry the guile-2.0 build later on.
Great. Please let me know if I can help further.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9F
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 23:23 -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> Rob Browning writes:
>
> > I'll try to get some time this week to run the tests on a porterbox --
> > see if I can reproduce the problem there.
>
> I was able to reproduce the problem on partch, and then poked around a
> bit. It looks lik
Rob Browning writes:
> I'll try to get some time this week to run the tests on a porterbox --
> see if I can reproduce the problem there.
I was able to reproduce the problem on partch, and then poked around a
bit. It looks like this might be a glibc bug that's addressed in
2.19-18+deb8u8: https
Rob Browning writes:
> Rob Browning writes:
>
>> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 22:06 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 11:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.
Unfortunately the powerpc build FTBFS
Rob Browning writes:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>
>> On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 22:06 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 11:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> > Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately the powerpc build FTBFS in the "check-guile" test.
>>>
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 22:06 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 11:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.
>>
>> Unfortunately the powerpc build FTBFS in the "check-guile" test.
>>
>> The build log for the most re
On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 22:06 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 11:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.
>
> Unfortunately the powerpc build FTBFS in the "check-guile" test.
>
> The build log for the most recent attempt can be found at
> https
On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 11:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.
Unfortunately the powerpc build FTBFS in the "check-guile" test.
The build log for the most recent attempt can be found at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=guile-2.0&arch=powerpc&ver=2.0
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 20:14 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:58:10PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
> > Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
> >
> > > Any news on that upload?
> >
> > I should be able to handle it before Tuesday, but le
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #841724 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package guile-2.0/2.0.11+1-9
Added tag(s) pending.
--
841724: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Rob,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:58:10PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
>
> > Any news on that upload?
>
> I should be able to handle it before Tuesday, but let me make sure I
> understand what's desired. We're talking about the 2.0.11+1-9+deb8u1
> changes I initia
Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
> Any news on that upload?
I should be able to handle it before Tuesday, but let me make sure I
understand what's desired. We're talking about the 2.0.11+1-9+deb8u1
changes I initially proposed?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as o
Hi Rob,
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 08:11:21PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 14:11 -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> > "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> >
> > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> > > Control: severity -1 normal
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #841724 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package guile-2.0/2.0.11+1-9
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #841724 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package guile-2.0/2.0.11+1-9
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
841724: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 14:11 -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> > Control: severity -1 normal
> >
> > On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 13:10 -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> >> I'd like to propose an update for jessie
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> Control: severity -1 normal
>
> On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 13:10 -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
>> I'd like to propose an update for jessie as described by the attached
>> debdiff. Though the final upload/diff might be slightly different
>> (i.e.
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: severity -1 normal
On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 13:10 -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> I'd like to propose an update for jessie as described by the attached
> debdiff. Though the final upload/diff might be slightly different
> (i.e. the dpm hashes).
>
> Both of the chan
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #841724 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package guile-2.0/2.0.11+1-9
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> severity -1 normal
Bug #841724 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package guile-2.0/2.0.11+1-9
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
--
841724: htt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to propose an update for jessie as described by the attached
debdiff. Though the final upload/diff might be slightly different
(i.e. the dpm hashes).
Both of the chang
21 matches
Mail list logo
