On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:38:00 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> I
> think the problem was that #839033's subject mentioned mips64el, but that
> information was outdated, and that confused the ftp team member. The fact that
> llvm-toolchain-snapshot builds versioned binaries that later get taken
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 00:38:00 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Keeping this bug opened here as Julien wanted to look at how we got here. I
Mostly I wanted ftpteam to know about this and maybe patch dak rm to
not remove stuff from different versions, or something to that effect.
Cheers,
On 16/10/16 10:56, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> Severity: normal
>
> nmu llvm-toolchain-3.8_1:3.8.1-12 . mips64el . unstable . -m "rebuild to fix
> wrongly removed binaries (cfr: #839033)"
>
> yes,
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
nmu llvm-toolchain-3.8_1:3.8.1-12 . mips64el . unstable . -m "rebuild to fix
wrongly removed binaries (cfr: #839033)"
yes, such packages have been wrongly removed with the llvm-toolchain-sn
4 matches
Mail list logo