On 15/07/16 11:13, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> It looks like #831336 that is preventing the rebuild of vtk6 will cause
> some delay in the testing migration of the packages involved in this
> transition.
>
> This leaves testing users of the qmapshack package affected by the
> critial issue repo
It looks like #831336 that is preventing the rebuild of vtk6 will cause
some delay in the testing migration of the packages involved in this
transition.
This leaves testing users of the qmapshack package affected by the
critial issue reported in #831297. It's been fixed with the new upstream
relea
On 07/13/2016 04:18 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/07/16 13:32, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.1.1.
>>
>> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.1.0 (#823335), there is no SONAME
>> bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account f
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-2.1.1.html
On 13/07/16 13:32, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #830966 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-2.1.1.html
Bug #830966 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.1.1.
Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.1.0 (#823335), there is no SONAME
bump, only the virtual ABI pack
6 matches
Mail list logo