Bug#815260: transition: libpgm

2016-03-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/03/16 12:03, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Can you please file bugs with severity:serious for all the packages that haven't been adapted yet? As I see, you already binNMUed those packages and no bug filing is needed. At

Bug#815260: transition: libpgm

2016-03-15 Thread GCS
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Can you please file bugs with severity:serious for all the packages that > haven't been adapted yet? As I see, you already binNMUed those packages and no bug filing is needed. At least not as serious, but asking to update the build

Bug#815260: transition: libpgm

2016-03-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 24/02/16 20:02, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 20/02/16 14:29, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: Looks like your zeromq3 upload started another transition. Not sure whether to just binNMU the rdeps... Have you build-tested them

Bug#815260: transition: libpgm

2016-02-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 24/02/16 20:02, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 20/02/16 14:29, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: >> Looks like your zeromq3 upload started another transition. Not sure whether >> to >> just binNMU the rdeps... Have you bui

Bug#815260: transition: libpgm

2016-02-24 Thread GCS
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 20/02/16 14:29, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > Looks like your zeromq3 upload started another transition. Not sure whether to > just binNMU the rdeps... Have you build-tested them? Yes, build tested level 2 already. The build

Bug#815260: transition: libpgm

2016-02-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 20/02/16 14:29, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > A small transition of libpgm, its soname changed from 5.1 to 5.2 which > is already in experimental. > > Affected packages

Processed: Re: Bug#815260: transition: libpgm

2016-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #815260 [release.debian.org] transition: libpgm Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 815260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815260 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#815260: transition: libpgm

2016-02-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 20/02/16 14:29, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > A small transition of libpgm, its soname changed from 5.1 to 5.2 which > is already in experimen

Bug#815260: transition: libpgm

2016-02-20 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition A small transition of libpgm, its soname changed from 5.1 to 5.2 which is already in experimental. Affected packages are: libxs zeromq zeromq3 Library packages are co-installable and ca