On 18.03.2016 12:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 24/02/16 20:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Now, the transition is started but your package still fails to build on a few
>> release architectures. That needs fixing.
>
> This transition just finished.
>
> Cheers,
> Emilio
All right.
On 14.03.2016 19:31, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> In. It's building on powerpc for two days now, but isn't expected to fail on
>> this arch,
>> never did in the last time.
>>
> There were network issues over the week-end where some of our powerpc
> gear is hosted. That should be fixed now.
>
> Cheer
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:51:54 +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:25:51 +0100 Daniel Stender wrote:
> > There only one officially supported arch currently not building on left
> > [1], which is
> > going to be fixed soon (it seems to be another problem in the tests
> > them
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:25:51 +0100 Daniel Stender wrote:
> There only one officially supported arch currently not building on left [1],
> which is
> going to be fixed soon (it seems to be another problem in the tests
> themselves).
> Then I'm going to upload the package to Sid then.
>
> DS
>
>
There only one officially supported arch currently not building on left [1],
which is
going to be fixed soon (it seems to be another problem in the tests themselves).
Then I'm going to upload the package to Sid then.
DS
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/817840 (libvigraimpex: fail of test/math on mips
On 24.02.2016 20:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> "fix unstable package" meaning 1.10.0+git20160120.803d5d4-2 with
>>> "libvigraimpex6", right?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Erm, no.
>
> I meant, fix the FTBFS in unstable without starting the transition. My bad.
>
> Now, the transition is started but you
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #815153 [release.debian.org] transition: libvigraimpex
Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
815153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815153
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 19/02/16 21:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 19/02/16 21:12, Daniel Stender wrote:
>> On 19.02.2016 21:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>>
>>> On 19/02/16 13:39, Daniel Stender wrote:
However, libvigraimpex currently doesn'
On 19/02/16 21:12, Daniel Stender wrote:
> On 19.02.2016 21:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> On 19/02/16 13:39, Daniel Stender wrote:
>>> However, libvigraimpex currently doesn't build on all official supported
>>> archs,
>>> I'm on this to get solved and upload
On 19.02.2016 21:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 19/02/16 13:39, Daniel Stender wrote:
>> However, libvigraimpex currently doesn't build on all official supported
>> archs,
>> I'm on this to get solved and upload one more package in experimental soon.
>
> Let
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 19/02/16 13:39, Daniel Stender wrote:
> However, libvigraimpex currently doesn't build on all official supported
> archs,
> I'm on this to get solved and upload one more package in experimental soon.
Let us know when that is solved. Bonus points if you also fix that
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #815153 [release.debian.org] transition: libvigraimpex
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
815153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815153
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I want to register a transition of libvigraimpex[1] because there are changes
in the ABI.
The new version of the package has been uploaded to experimental now,
it's 1.10.0+git201
13 matches
Mail list logo
