Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

2016-02-11 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > You have a now useless > > Breaks: liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5 (<= 3.3.2~r61000-3.1) > > in there. > > For the changelog I would say something like "Reinstate the g++-5 ABI > transition and renamed packages." Breaks field was removed with lates

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

2016-02-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2016-02-06 13:59, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> What is the best way to fix this? >> >> Probably reverting the reverted transition, therefore reopening this bug. >> >> You can drop the v5 suffix once upstream bumps the SOVERSION again and >>

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

2016-02-06 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> What is the best way to fix this? > > Probably reverting the reverted transition, therefore reopening this bug. > > You can drop the v5 suffix once upstream bumps the SOVERSION again and > you have to rename the package anyway. I'm prepar

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

2016-02-03 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: found -1 3.3.2~r63423-1 On 2016-02-03 11:45, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> The v5 transition was entirely unnecessary for this package, and I very >>> strongly want it gone. >>> >> You haven't given a single good reason to revert the cha

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

2016-02-03 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> The v5 transition was entirely unnecessary for this package, and I very >> strongly want it gone. >> > You haven't given a single good reason to revert the change. Maybe you > would have preferred it didn't, but you're coming 6 months late

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

2016-02-03 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:46:02 +0100, Tino Didriksen wrote: > On 3 February 2016 at 02:57, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:00:44 + Julien Cristau > > wrote: > > > lttoolbox (3.3.2~r61000-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium > > > . > > >* Non-maintainer upload. > > >

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

2016-02-03 Thread Tino Didriksen
On 3 February 2016 at 02:57, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:00:44 + Julien Cristau > wrote: > > lttoolbox (3.3.2~r61000-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* Non-maintainer upload. > >* Rename library packages for g++5 ABI transition (closes: 791195). > > This

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

2016-02-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:00:44 + Julien Cristau wrote: > lttoolbox (3.3.2~r61000-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Non-maintainer upload. >* Rename library packages for g++5 ABI transition (closes: 791195). This change was recently reverted and I'm not convinced that this was a goo