On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 at 10:06:36 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Yes, as per our dda mail anything that needs a libstdc++ followup
> transition and whose dependencies are ready is fair game for upload to
> unstable.
I have uploaded Kari's changes to unstable so we can move on to the
next mini-transi
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 08:35:39 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> cxxtools does not appear to build-depend on anything lower down the
> libstdc++ transition stack, and the maintainer (cc'd here) has provided
> a patch.
>
> Release team: is this ready for a maintainer upload to unstable?
>
Yes, as
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 at 22:54:13 +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
> Cxxtools uses std::string as a part of its API, which causes Cxxtools
> to expose libstdc++ via its ABI.
>
> Patch attached for a 9v5 version.
cxxtools does not appear to build-depend on anything lower down the
libstdc++ transition stack
3 matches
Mail list logo
