Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 12:56 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 12:53 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> >> > If you were referring to whether to take the backport route or adding
> >> > the patch, then either is fine as long as the version number ma
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #784801 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package cproto/4.7l-4
Added tag(s) pending.
--
784801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784801
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
> On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 12:53 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
>> > If you were referring to whether to take the backport route or adding
>> > the patch, then either is fine as long as the version number makes sense
>> > for the approach taken.
>>
>> I've attached a patch for 4.7l-3+deb8u1, which I
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 12:53 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > If you were referring to whether to take the backport route or adding
> > the patch, then either is fine as long as the version number makes sense
> > for the approach taken.
>
> I've attached a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #784801 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package cproto/4.7l-4
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #784801 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package cproto/4.7l-4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
784801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
> The diff for -3+deb8u1 would be; -4~deb8u1 would include an extra
> changelog stanza (as it would have -4's and then -4~deb8u1's).
>
>> I haven't prepared the jessie-specific package yet, because I wasn't
>> sure it was worthwhile... I can rebuild against jessie or unstable,
>> whichever you pref
On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 10:15 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2015 4:57 AM, "Adam D. Barratt"
> wrote:
> >
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 18:17 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > > In April of 2013 (version 4.7j-7), I converted cproto to debhelper
> 7.
On May 9, 2015 4:57 AM, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 18:17 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > In April of 2013 (version 4.7j-7), I converted cproto to debhelper 7.
> > In the process, I accidentally lost the only option I was passing to
> > co
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 18:17 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> In April of 2013 (version 4.7j-7), I converted cproto to debhelper 7.
> In the process, I accidentally lost the only option I was passing to
> configure (--enable-llib). As a result, I disabled the -X comman
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #784801 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package cproto/4.7l-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
784801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784801
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I am requesting permission to fix a functional regression in cproto with
an upload to proposed-updates-new for jessie. This may or may not meet
the criteria of a "truly critica
11 matches
Mail list logo
