Bug#773140: unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1

2014-12-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:20AM -0800, Blair Hester wrote: > > > rabbitmq-server maintainers, are there any other RC bugs that you're > > planning to file on the package? > > No other RC bugs. I submitted Ok, the t-p-u upload can go ahead. Please remove the

Processed: Re: Bug#773140: unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1

2014-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #773140 [release.debian.org] unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #773140 to the same tags previously set -- 773140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773140 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#773140: unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1

2014-12-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo On 2014-12-16 15:47, Thomas Goirand wrote: Now, seeing that 3.4.0 is in Sid, is it ok to target testing-proposed-updates for 3.3.5-1.1 here? We would also update Sid to 3.4.1 then. Please let me know, and I'll work out with Blair Hester and probably Matt

Processed: Re: Bug#773140: unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1

2014-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo Bug #773140 [release.debian.org] unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 773140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773140 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- T

Bug#773140: unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1

2014-12-16 Thread Thomas Goirand
> That new upstream version was uploaded at urgency=high the day before > the freeze, with no explanation other than "new upstream release". > Given that 3.4.0 had been out for a fortnight by that point, it looks > very much like trying to game the freeze. :-( It indeed looks bad. I believe this i

Bug#773140: unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1

2014-12-16 Thread Blair Hester
> rabbitmq-server maintainers, are there any other RC bugs that you're > planning to file on the package? No other RC bugs. I submitted https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773259, which I hope has an appropriate severity of important. I've asked a couple developers their opinion on

Bug#773140: unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1

2014-12-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 2014-12-14 23:07, Matt Kraai wrote: Is it OK to uploade rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1 to testing-proposed-updates? 773134 reports that it is insecure because it trusts the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header. The following patches were applied upstream to fix this: * ht

Processed: Re: Bug#773140: unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1

2014-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #773140 [release.debian.org] unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 773140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773140 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRI

Bug#773140: unblock: rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1

2014-12-14 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Is it OK to uploade rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1 to testing-proposed-updates? 773134 reports that it is insecure because it trusts the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header. The following patches were