Hi Philipp (2014.05.04_22:50:53_+0200)
> I'd argue that 8 would be right for Jessie and 7.0 somewhat wrong for
> Wheezy, hence I'd tend to agree to the change. Stefano, where is this
> used?
I don't know of anything that uses the --release flag (or that data).
It's possible that people use it in
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 01:03:22PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Stefano Rivera (2014-05-04):
> > There are also a couple of minor support date updates, included, trivial
> > packaging changes, and a bugfix to the Debian release versions. I don't
> > think that risks regressions.
> >
> > As in
Hi Cyril (2014.05.04_13:03:22_+0200)
> Adding an Ubuntu entry would look OK to me. Updating dates, probably so.
> Changing behaviour in stable doesn't look right to me. Who knows how
> many packages and local scripts rely on the current output?
Yeah, I'm fine with not including that bit. It is
bac
Hi Stefano.
Stefano Rivera (2014-05-04):
> There are also a couple of minor support date updates, included, trivial
> packaging changes, and a bugfix to the Debian release versions. I don't
> think that risks regressions.
>
> As in the past, e.g. #727020, I'd be nice if this could go through
> s
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi, can we please update distro-info-data, to add the next Ubuntu
release, 14.10 - Utopic Unicorn.
There are also a couple of minor support date updates, included, trivial
packaging
5 matches
Mail list logo
