On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 21:03:41 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 18:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 2014-02-06 21:20, Adam Conrad wrote:
> > > Requestion a transition slot to upload eglibc 2.18 to unstable.
> > > The number of rdeps with an exact glibc dependency (due
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 18:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2014-02-06 21:20, Adam Conrad wrote:
> > Requestion a transition slot to upload eglibc 2.18 to unstable.
> > The number of rdeps with an exact glibc dependency (due to using
> > internal symbols) is quite low, and should all be binNMUab
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2014-02-06 21:20, Adam Conrad wrote:
Requestion a transition slot to upload eglibc 2.18 to unstable.
The number of rdeps with an exact glibc dependency (due to using
internal symbols) is quite low, and should all be binNMUable.
Assuming that all we're expecting
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #737906 [release.debian.org] transition: eglibc
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
737906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
(please explain about the transition: impacted packages, reason, ...
for more info see: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions)
Requestion a transition slot to upload egl
5 matches
Mail list logo
