Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-04-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On 2014-04-18 16:53, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Fri, April 18, 2014 17:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Just a gentle reminder, the window for getting an upload in to the 7.5 point release closes over the weekend. Thanks for the reminder. It should have been uploaded les

Processed: Re: Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #736494 [release.debian.org] pu: package php5/5.4.45.4.4-14+deb7u8 Added tag(s) pending. -- 736494: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736494 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-04-18 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Fri, April 18, 2014 17:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2014-04-16 16:18, William Dauchy wrote: >> On Apr16 11:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> On a related note, it would be appreciated if comments such as >>> "cleanup >>> series" were more verbose in future, as it appears to have involved >>> rem

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-04-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2014-04-16 16:18, William Dauchy wrote: On Apr16 11:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote: One thing that wasn't absolutely clear from the original (although I guess was potentially implied) is whether any of the fixes which are relevant have previously been applied in some way to the packages in unsta

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-04-16 Thread William Dauchy
On Apr16 11:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > One thing that wasn't absolutely clear from the original (although I guess > was potentially implied) is whether any of the fixes which are relevant have > previously been applied in some way to the packages in unstable. All the fixes are backports from ups

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-04-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On 2014-04-16 10:19, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Sun, April 13, 2014 14:39, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 13:58 +0200, William Dauchy wrote: Is there someone available to validate this package? Lots of present fixes are more than needed to have an usable version of php in prod

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-04-16 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Adam, On Sun, April 13, 2014 14:39, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 13:58 +0200, William Dauchy wrote: >> Is there someone available to validate this package? Lots of present >> fixes are more than needed to have an usable version of php in >> production. > > Such comments really

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-04-13 Thread William Dauchy
Hello Adam, Thank your for your quick reply. On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > I realise you've put a lot of effort in to the patch, and that's > obviously appreciated, but a diff for stable of the size > > 46 files changed, 4303 insertions(+), 372 deletions(-) > > where

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-04-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 13:58 +0200, William Dauchy wrote: > Is there someone available to validate this package? Lots of present > fixes are more than needed to have an usable version of php in > production. Such comments really aren't that helpful. It's entirely possible "to have an usable version

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-04-13 Thread William Dauchy
Hi, Is there someone available to validate this package? Lots of present fixes are more than needed to have an usable version of php in production. Thanks, -- William -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-03-18 Thread William Dauchy
On 18 Mar 2014 12:18, "Clement Wong" wrote: > > Ok, sorry for the misleading email, apparently 7u8 is from wheezy-security, so this fix is not applied yet. Yes indeed.

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-03-18 Thread Clement Wong
Ok, sorry for the misleading email, apparently 7u8 is from wheezy-security, so this fix is not applied yet. Clement On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Clement Wong wrote: > Hi William, > > 5.4.4-14+deb7u8 didn’t pass our test, but the one you sent me (8.1) works, > can you think of any reason why

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-03-18 Thread Clement Wong
Hi William, 5.4.4-14+deb7u8 didn’t pass our test, but the one you sent me (8.1) works, can you think of any reason why this is happening? Clement On Mar 10, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Clement Wong wrote: > Hi, > > I’ve confirm that this package passed our tests, solved sybase problem, and > not caus

Bug#736494: About #736494

2014-03-10 Thread Clement Wong
Hi, I’ve confirm that this package passed our tests, solved sybase problem, and not causing other regressions. Thanks for working on this. Feel free to poke me for any test in the future, our systems are highly integrated with all kinds of MS/MS-compatible products. Like AD/Samba4/SQLSRV/OpenC