On Mon, June 16, 2014 00:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 17:55 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> I have just uploaded apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u2:
>
> Flagged for acceptance; sorry for the delay.
>
>> apache2 (2.2.22-13+deb7u2) wheezy; urgency=medium
>>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 17:55 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> I have just uploaded apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u2:
>
> Flagged for acceptance; sorry for the delay.
Awesome, thanks!
>> apache2 (2.2.22-13+deb7u2) wheez
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 17:55 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> I have just uploaded apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u2:
Flagged for acceptance; sorry for the delay.
> apache2 (2.2.22-13+deb7u2) wheezy; urgency=medium
>
> * Backport support for SSL ECC keys and ECDH ciphers.
For
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #733564 [release.debian.org] pu: apache2 with ECDHE support
Added tag(s) pending.
--
733564: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733564
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
I have just uploaded apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u2:
apache2 (2.2.22-13+deb7u2) wheezy; urgency=medium
* Backport support for SSL ECC keys and ECDH ciphers.
Bump build-dependency for libssl-dev to 1.0.1e-2+deb7u8 to get the
compatibility fix for older Safari browsers. Apache2 will still
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 23:29 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:34:43PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > + * Actually restart the services when restart-without-asking is set.
> > +(Closes: #745801)
> >
> > That change wasn't previously mentioned and is not fixed in the uns
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:34:43PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 15:59 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:57:21PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 14. April 2014, 21:18:46 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > > > So I'd say that we should go and add E
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 15:59 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:57:21PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Am Montag, 14. April 2014, 21:18:46 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > > So I'd say that we should go and add ECDHE support to Apache as
> > > suggested and also patch OpenSSL for the
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:57:21PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 14. April 2014, 21:18:46 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > So I'd say that we should go and add ECDHE support to Apache as
> > suggested and also patch OpenSSL for the OS X bug as the
> > fingerprinting landed upstream and we woul
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 03:39:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I would like to also add support for the padding extention in
> > stable. It's part of the 1.0.1g release.
>
> NACK, at least for now.
I might have not mailed
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I would like to also add support for the padding extention in
> stable. It's part of the 1.0.1g release.
NACK, at least for now.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:07:30PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:57:21PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Am Montag, 14. April 2014, 21:18:46 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > > So I'd say that we should go and add ECDHE support to Apache as
> > > suggested and also patch OpenSSL f
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:57:21PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 14. April 2014, 21:18:46 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > So I'd say that we should go and add ECDHE support to Apache as
> > suggested and also patch OpenSSL for the OS X bug as the
> > fingerprinting landed upstream and we woul
Am Montag, 14. April 2014, 21:18:46 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> So I'd say that we should go and add ECDHE support to Apache as
> suggested and also patch OpenSSL for the OS X bug as the
> fingerprinting landed upstream and we would merely replicate
> current upstream behavior.
OK, sounds good.
Kurt,
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:02:46AM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Browser support in itself is not the interesting factor here. We are
> not disabling other ciphers, so clients not supporting ECDHE will just
> continue to work. The question is how many browsers have broken
> implemetations
Am Montag, 30. Dezember 2013, 15:23:17 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 01:41:31PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Stefan Fritsch (2013-12-30):
> > > Am Sonntag, 29. Dezember 2013, 23:58:54 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > > > Adding ECDHE support in apache will probably require
> > > > ba
Hi,
>> This was added somewhere in a 2.3 version and so only part of a
>> stable release in 2.4.
>
> This has been backported to 2.2.26 in the meantime:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1540727
> more readable diff:
> https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/058a25cdcb425728
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 01:41:31PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Stefan Fritsch (2013-12-30):
> > Am Sonntag, 29. Dezember 2013, 23:58:54 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > > Adding ECDHE support in apache will probably require backporting the
> > > patches for that. I'm not sure how much work that is go
Stefan Fritsch (2013-12-30):
> Am Sonntag, 29. Dezember 2013, 23:58:54 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > Adding ECDHE support in apache will probably require backporting the
> > patches for that. I'm not sure how much work that is going to be
> > and wether someone like redhat might have already done that
Am Sonntag, 29. Dezember 2013, 23:58:54 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> I would like to see apache in stable support ECDHE.
I agree with Kurt that this is desirable. The perception what ciphers
can be considered secure has changed greatly since wheezy has been
frozen. Adding more options is good.
> This
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Severity: normal
Hi,
I would like to see apache in stable support ECDHE. This was
added somewhere in a 2.3 version and so only part of a stable
release in 2.4.
The reason I want to see is ECDHE is that we want
21 matches
Mail list logo
