Le 02/10/2013 19:43, Julien Cristau a écrit :
>>> I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you
>>> asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian.
>>> [...]
>>> Hoping that this will help for the Ocaml transition,
>>
>> That was one week ago. nova has migrated to
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 07:36:00 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 25/09/2013 04:56, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> > I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you
> > asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian.
> > [...]
> > Hoping that this will help for the O
Le 25/09/2013 04:56, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you
> asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian.
> [...]
> Hoping that this will help for the Ocaml transition,
That was one week ago. nova has migrated to testing and
Hi,
I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you
asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian.
Thanks Stephane for keeping your calm, baring with me, and taking the
time to explain your point of view. I suppose you understood that I'm
disappointed to have to
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:02:07 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 09/24/2013 09:48 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> >> However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about
> >> it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. I
Le 24/09/2013 19:00, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> Please don't think this way.
>
> I work daily on 79 packages to maintain OpenStack in Debian:
>
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
If you go that way, I could say that you're blocking my work on 214
p
On 09/24/2013 10:04 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 24/09/2013 15:48, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>> If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following
>> new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins,
>> nova-compute-xen.
>>
>> xcp-guest-templates is built by gue
On 09/24/2013 09:48 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>> However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about
>> it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team
>> is reading: just let everything transition to tes
Le 24/09/2013 15:48, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following
> new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins,
> nova-compute-xen.
>
> xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf
> package and c
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about
> it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team
> is reading: just let everything transition to testing, and remove the
> old version of XCP 1.3.2 in t
Hi,
> As for becoming more upstream-friendly, there are now several of us
> working to make that happen. Euan Harris is working hard on actually
> creating packages from this work, though the shape of these packages
> is quite different from that of the old-style 1.3.2 packages. We
> should start
On 10.09.2013 16:07, Jon Ludlam wrote:
> Hmm, I'm not having much success in replicating the build environment for
> this -
> however, I did notice two patches in the ubuntu xen-api package that look
> relevant. The build failure appears to be related to xenguest, and there is a
> patch 'xenguest-
Hmm, I'm not having much success in replicating the build environment
for this - however, I did notice two patches in the ubuntu xen-api
package that look relevant. The build failure appears to be related to
xenguest, and there is a patch 'xenguest-4.2.patch' which looks worth a
test. Also, I n
On 10/09/13 14:09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as "new
upstream release" for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works.
Upstream version fo
On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>> I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as "new
>> upstream release" for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works.
>> Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for C
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as "new
> upstream release" for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works.
> Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for CentOS are
> different, and just using upstream 1.6 d
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 08:42:29 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> The FTBFS bug has been reported in June. I told some of the maintainers
> (in-person, in CC) to update this package during debconf. No activity
> since them. IMHO, this package is neglected and should be removed from
> testing.
>
>
On 09/06/2013 02:42 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 05/09/2013 23:18, Julien Cristau a écrit :
>> tracker adjusted. xen-api is currently broken though, so you'll need to
>> get that fixed before starting.
>
> I've just fixed a blocking bug (#713349) which was due to the renaming
> of an OCaml lib
06.09.2013 10:42, Stéphane Glondu write:
[]
Now, xen-api FTBFS because of what looks like an API change in some (C)
dependency:
[]
On the other hand, there is a new upstream release (upstream version is
1.6 and unstable version is 1.3.2). It doesn't make sense to me to
invest time in this witho
Le 05/09/2013 23:18, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> tracker adjusted. xen-api is currently broken though, so you'll need to
> get that fixed before starting.
I've just fixed a blocking bug (#713349) which was due to the renaming
of an OCaml library (type-conv -> type_conv).
Now, xen-api FTBFS becaus
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:43:36 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Managers,
>
> I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.00.1 (released last
> November) as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Managers,
I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.00.1 (released last
November) as soon as possible. It breaks some packages; most of them
have been fixed in experim
22 matches
Mail list logo
