Re: Bug#710140: gpgme1.0 dropped libgpgme-pth

2013-11-05 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Samstag, den 05.10.2013, 11:41 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli: > On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:06:14 +0200 Daniel Leidert wrote: > > [...] > > Am Sonntag, den 25.08.2013, 12:19 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli: > [...] > > > Could you please clarify the status of the bug? > > > Thanks for your time! > > >

Re: Bug#710140: gpgme1.0 dropped libgpgme-pth (was: Any progress?)

2013-11-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 15:06:14 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > please try to CC 710...@bugs.debian.org in your response > > Am Sonntag, den 25.08.2013, 12:19 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli: > > > is anyone working on bug #710140 ? > > Is there any progress? > > Well, there was only libgpgme++2 a

Re: Bug#710140: gpgme1.0 dropped libgpgme-pth

2013-11-03 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 11:41:55 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > I waited some time before speaking again, as I was hoping to see some > comments from other people, possibly members of the release team. > > Anyway, do I understand correctly that this issue has currently a > practical impact only o

Re: Bug#710140: gpgme1.0 dropped libgpgme-pth

2013-10-05 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:06:14 +0200 Daniel Leidert wrote: [...] > Am Sonntag, den 25.08.2013, 12:19 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli: [...] > > Could you please clarify the status of the bug? > > Thanks for your time! > > CCing release.d.o. > [...] > I'm hereby asking the release team how to proceed?

Bug#710140: gpgme1.0 dropped libgpgme-pth (was: Any progress?)

2013-09-03 Thread Daniel Leidert
please try to CC 710...@bugs.debian.org in your response Am Sonntag, den 25.08.2013, 12:19 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli: > is anyone working on bug #710140 ? > Is there any progress? Well, there was only libgpgme++2 affected by this upstream change and this package has seen two uploads since its