On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 20:02 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On dim., 2013-05-26 at 17:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 17:02 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > In the meanwhile, would it be possible to remove both packages
> > > (squeeze/0.2.3-12 and thunar-vfs/1.2.0-
On dim., 2013-05-26 at 17:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 17:02 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > In the meanwhile, would it be possible to remove both packages
> > (squeeze/0.2.3-12 and thunar-vfs/1.2.0-3) from testing?
>
> Unfortunately
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #709898 [release.debian.org] RM: squeeze/0.2.3-12 thunar-vfs/1.2.0-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
709898: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709898
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 17:02 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> In the meanwhile, would it be possible to remove both packages
> (squeeze/0.2.3-12 and thunar-vfs/1.2.0-3) from testing?
Unfortunately we can't do that right now:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken D
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Owner: pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as thunar-vfs is obsolete, we'd like to remove it from Jessie. We can't
remove it from unstable just yet since Squeeze still depends on it.
Unt
5 matches
Mail list logo