Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:03 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My understanding is that this 1-year old proposed update will be
> blocked as long as no super-serious testing of its effect on the
> Squeeze->Wheezy upgrade is done.
>
> Does anyone here intend to do so at some point, or should we
Hi,
Sergei Golovan wrote (29 Sep 2013 22:07:34 GMT) :
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Sergei Golovan (2013-09-30):
>>> I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No
>>> complains whatsoever.
>>
>> yes, I saw that, and that's nice. That doesn'
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Sergei,
>
> Sergei Golovan (2013-09-30):
>> I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No
>> complains whatsoever.
>
> yes, I saw that, and that's nice. That doesn't buy us squeeze→wheezy
> upgrade testing, thou
Hi Sergei,
Sergei Golovan (2013-09-30):
> I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No
> complains whatsoever.
yes, I saw that, and that's nice. That doesn't buy us squeeze→wheezy
upgrade testing, though, which is what we would like to avoid breaking
or worsening.
Mraw
Hi Cyril,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [ Dropping Holger from Cc, jenkins is more or less irrelevant anyway. ]
>
> Julien Cristau (2013-03-19):
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 13:36:31 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>>
>> > I suggest preparing and proposing a Jenkins dist-upgrad
[ Dropping Holger from Cc, jenkins is more or less irrelevant anyway. ]
Julien Cristau (2013-03-19):
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 13:36:31 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>
> > I suggest preparing and proposing a Jenkins dist-upgrade job (either
> > as a patch against an existing appropriate job, or as a n
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 698778 = pu
Usertags were: unblock.
Usertags are now: pu.
> tags 698778 + wheezy
Bug #698778 [release.de
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 698778 = pu
tags 698778 + wheezy
retitle 698778 pu: expect/5.45-2+deb7u1
thanks
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 15:02 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> >
> > expectk has two reverse dependencies in s
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote (19 Mar 2013 18:38:10 GMT) :
> Does this test random combinations of installed packages?
What I suggested does not, but one could imagine and implement a more
involved test case.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intriger
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 13:36:31 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> I suggest preparing and proposing a Jenkins dist-upgrade job (either
> as a patch against an existing appropriate job, or as a new job) to
> Holger (Cc'd), so that we have an easy way to verify that the Squeeze
> to Wheezy upgrade is indee
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #698778 [release.debian.org] preapproval of expect/5.45-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
698778: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698778
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Sergei,
(disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team.)
Sergei Golovan wrote (26 Jan 2013 06:07:52 GMT) :
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>
>> Anything like that needs to get tons of testing to ensure it doesn't
>> have unwanted results
Hi again!
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Sergei Golovan wrote:
>
> expectk has two reverse dependencies in squeeze: exmh (suggests)
> xsmbrowser (depends). Both are removed from wheezy and sid.
>
> Currently, update expect from squeeze (5.44.1.15-4) to wheezy (5.45-2)
> goes silently, leaving
Hi!
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
> Anything like that needs to get tons of testing to ensure it doesn't
> have unwanted results in squeeze to wheezy upgrades.
expectk has two reverse dependencies in squeeze: exmh (suggests)
xsmbrowser (depends). Both are removed fro
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:07:04 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > --- expect-5.45/debian/control
> > +++ expect-5.45/debian/control
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > Package: expect
> > Architecture: any
> > Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
> > +Breaks: expectk (<< 5.45)
>
> AFAIK you shou
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> + * Added breaks header to the debian/control file which ensures that the
> +no longer existing expectk package is installed (closes: #686364).
s/is installed/gets removed/.
> --- expect-5.45/debian/control
> +++ expect-5.45/debian/control
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi!
I'd like to upload expect/5.45-3 with the following modification:
I've added 'Breaks: expectk' header because the expectk package does
not exist anymore but the one from squeeze remains
17 matches
Mail list logo
