Subject: unblock: dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-9
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
This mail follow the discussion with Jonathan Wiltshire in bug #698701 [1],
hence the In-Reply-To.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Le dimanche 3 février 2013 14:51:39, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
>
> Anyway, I tried to get certainty by reading the code to see any assumption
> the code is using but I couldn't understand enough of the code. So I
> reached upstream and he shall give me an explanation about wether it's
> safe or
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 04:23:43PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> On 2013-01-22 13:15, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
>> >Sorry to come again with an issue on dspam again. This time it's
>> >about
>> >bug #698580 - useless prompting at upgrade when no configuration
>fil
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 04:23:43PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2013-01-22 13:15, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> >Sorry to come again with an issue on dspam again. This time it's
> >about
> >bug #698580 - useless prompting at upgrade when no configuration file
> >have been modified. A mistake
On 2013-01-22 13:15, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Sorry to come again with an issue on dspam again. This time it's
about
bug #698580 - useless prompting at upgrade when no configuration file
have been modified. A mistake was made which made
/etc/dspam/dspam.d/{pgsql,mysql}.conf be conffiles and yet
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dspam
Sorry to come again with an issue on dspam again. This time it's about
bug #698580 - useless prompting at upgrade when no configuration file
have been modified.
6 matches
Mail list logo
