On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 21:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (06/01/2013):
> > Thanks. It looks okay to me, but then so did the previous
> > versions. :-( Doing the CC-for-a-d-i-ack too in case there are any
> > comments from that side.
>
> AFAICT from the comments, can't be worse
Adam D. Barratt (06/01/2013):
> Thanks. It looks okay to me, but then so did the previous
> versions. :-( Doing the CC-for-a-d-i-ack too in case there are any
> comments from that side.
AFAICT from the comments, can't be worse than without that patch, so
let's get that in for rc1…
Also, sorry fo
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 22:13 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
>
> On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 20:03 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Please unblock package qcontrol
> >
> > The fix in +wheezy1 (unblock request #694267) was incomplete because it
> > relied
> > on the --dire
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #697547 [release.debian.org] unblock: tpu (pre-approval)
qcontrol/0.4.2-7+wheezy2
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
697547: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697547
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 20:03 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Please unblock package qcontrol
>
> The fix in +wheezy1 (unblock request #694267) was incomplete because it relied
> on the --direct flag which was only present in the version of qcontrol in sid.
> This new
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package qcontrol
The fix in +wheezy1 (unblock request #694267) was incomplete because it relied
on the --direct flag which was only present in the version of qcontrol in sid.
6 matches
Mail list logo
