Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #697190 {Done: Niels Thykier } [release.debian.org]
unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-3
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #697190 to the same values
previously set
--
697190: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Control: reopen -1
On 2013-02-01 17:09, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 13:27:07 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This still can't migrate due to a 'missing' armhf build (can no longer
>> build it because mono in sid no longer supports armhf).
>>
>> So I think someo
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 13:27:07 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This still can't migrate due to a 'missing' armhf build (can no longer
> build it because mono in sid no longer supports armhf).
>
> So I think someone must ask ftpmaster to remove the virtuoso-opensource
> armhf package
On 2013-02-01 14:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 01.02.2013 13:27, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This still can't migrate due to a 'missing' armhf build (can no longer
>> build it because mono in sid no longer supports armhf).
>>
>> So I think someone must ask ftpmaster to remove the virtu
On 01.02.2013 13:27, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi,
This still can't migrate due to a 'missing' armhf build (can no
longer
build it because mono in sid no longer supports armhf).
So I think someone must ask ftpmaster to remove the
virtuoso-opensource
armhf packages from testing.
Yes, and n
Hi,
This still can't migrate due to a 'missing' armhf build (can no longer
build it because mono in sid no longer supports armhf).
So I think someone must ask ftpmaster to remove the virtuoso-opensource
armhf packages from testing.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.
On 29/01/13 01:45, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Christoph, please could you give back virtuoso-opensource on both
>> kfreebsd-* arches for another build attempt?
>
> On the way
Thank you, both builds were fine.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/01/13 23:02, intrigeri wrote:
>> José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (16 Jan 2013 17:33:25 GMT) :
>>> I've uploaded Virtuoso again because in the -2 revision of the package I
>>> did
>>> wrong fix for this bug:
>>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Hi,
On 26/01/13 23:02, intrigeri wrote:
> José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (16 Jan 2013 17:33:25 GMT) :
>> I've uploaded Virtuoso again because in the -2 revision of the package I did
>> wrong fix for this bug:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677286
> [...]
> So all in all, t
Hi,
José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (16 Jan 2013 17:33:25 GMT) :
> I've uploaded Virtuoso again because in the -2 revision of the package I did
> wrong fix for this bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677286
> Hopefully it's now fixed correctly. I'm attaching the debdiff ag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 697190 unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-3
Bug #697190 [release.debian.org] unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-3' from
'unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1
retitle 697190 unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-3
tags 697190 - moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
I've uploaded Virtuoso again because in the -2 revision of the package I did
wrong fix for this bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677286
Hopefully it's now fixed correctly. I'm att
Hi,
José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (12 Jan 2013 23:37:41 GMT) :
> Just for your information, I tried to do a couple malicious things in the
> worst case scenario (i.e. with the unix socket enabled): [...]
Thanks for checking!
> I doubt this can be security problem, but if you figure out a wa
Hello,
intrigeri
> Hi,
>
> José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (02 Jan 2013 20:22:43 GMT) :
> > intrigeri
> >
> >> From a remote point-of-view, this is worrying: do you mean something
> >> during the installation will access or create a file with a fixed name
> >> in /tmp?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
>
Hi,
José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (02 Jan 2013 20:22:43 GMT) :
> intrigeri
>> From a remote point-of-view, this is worrying: do you mean something
>> during the installation will access or create a file with a fixed name
>> in /tmp?
> Yes.
>> May it have security implications?
> Unfortuna
intrigeri
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (02 Jan 2013 13:01:43 GMT) :
> > Caveat: if you need to try to install virtuoso as a standalone server
> > while using kde, please make sure that a virtuoso server (launched by
> > nepomuk/soprano) isn't already
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #697190 [release.debian.org] unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
697190: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697190
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UN
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (02 Jan 2013 13:01:43 GMT) :
> Caveat: if you need to try to install virtuoso as a standalone server while
> using kde, please make sure that a virtuoso server (launched by
> nepomuk/soprano) isn't already using the file /tmp/virt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
could you please unblock the virtuoso-opensource package? I have fixed a couple
of important bugs which should be included in wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
19 matches
Mail list logo
