Hi,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 20:10 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> I deleted these patches and applied the patch for correcting #676841 from
>> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cairo-dock-team/cairo
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo + confirmed
Bug #694614 [release.debian.org] tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #694614 [release.debian.org] tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
694614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + confirmed
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 20:10 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> I deleted these patches and applied the patch for correcting #676841 from
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cairo-dock-team/cairo-dock-core/cairo-dock/revision/1075.
> Would you check this?
+cairo-d
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 13:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> I have to admit I'm slightly confused by the patches for #676841.
>> According to the bug log, upstream indicated that the issue was related
>
Hi,
Dear Adm:
Thanks! But, I don't have enough time until next weekend.
Dear Iwamatsu:
I would be grad If you reply at your free time.
At 1 Jan 2013 13:09:02 +,
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 13:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #694614 [release.debian.org] tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #694614 to the same tags previously set
--
694614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694614
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 13:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I have to admit I'm slightly confused by the patches for #676841.
> According to the bug log, upstream indicated that the issue was related
> to optimisation when compiled with GCC 4.7, and that the fix was the
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 14:14 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> And I attached a patch which remove hardening support.
>
> Could you check this?
Thanks for the patch.
I have to admit I'm slightly confused by the patches for #676841.
According to the bug log, upstream indicated that the issue was r
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
>
> Unless an argument can be made for a package particularly needing
> hardening support adding (e.g. it's on the security team's list) then
> such changes are generally too invasive to be made at this stage via
> unstable. The fact th
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 11:40 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 07:27:37 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> >
> >> Is this invasive?
> >>
> > Is this a real question? It changes things about the generated code
> > tha
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 07:27:37 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>
>> Is this invasive?
>>
> Is this a real question? It changes things about the generated code
> that can't be reviewed...
Hmm. Sorry, I did not understand about mean "
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 07:27:37 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Is this invasive?
>
Is this a real question? It changes things about the generated code
that can't be reviewed...
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 07:30:16 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>
>> +cairo-dock (3.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
>> +
>> + * Add dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~) to Build-Depends.
>> + * Enable hardening.
>
> I'd prefer if the above items were l
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 07:30:16 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> +cairo-dock (3.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> + * Add dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~) to Build-Depends.
> + * Enable hardening.
I'd prefer if the above items were left out.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
Hi,
I attched updated debdiff.
V2;
- Fix typo rigin to Origin in patches.
- Revert "Update debhelper to 9".
change version from 9 to 7 of debian/compat and version of debhelper.
Could you check ?
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:20 AM, David Prévot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 30/11/2012 21:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit :
>
- Enable hardening build
- Update debhelper >= 9, Add dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)
>>>
>>> As much as I like the hardening effort, I think we're too late in the
>>> freez
Hi,
Le 30/11/2012 21:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit :
>>> - Enable hardening build
>>> - Update debhelper >= 9, Add dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)
>>
>> As much as I like the hardening effort, I think we're too late in the
>> freeze for such a change (unless it was explicitly requested by the
>> secu
Hi,
Thanks for your review.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:26 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> tags 694614 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> (Disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team.)
>
> Youhei SASAKI wrote (28 Nov 2012 11:05:58 GMT) :
>> I'd like to get your approval about the upload of cairo-dock 3.0.0-3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 694614 + moreinfo
Bug #694614 [release.debian.org] tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
694614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
tags 694614 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
(Disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team.)
Youhei SASAKI wrote (28 Nov 2012 11:05:58 GMT) :
> I'd like to get your approval about the upload of cairo-dock 3.0.0-3
> to testing-proposed-update in order to fix 1 RC bug and enable
> hardening build.
Thank you
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'd like to get your approval about the upload of cairo-dock 3.0.0-3 to
testing-proposed-update in order to fix 1 RC bug and enable hardening build.
The changes from 3.0.0-2 (in wheezy) to
21 matches
Mail list logo
