The complete description that you provide confirms that your changes
will most probably not reach wheezy, as they are not compliant with
the current freeze policy [1].
#688558 has a severity of normal. The worst other patched bug (ever
growing config file) seems a normal bug to me [2].
[1] http:/
I hope my explanations helped to clarify these tiny, but for the user
experience enormously helpful patches.
How do you plan to proceed with this?
Thanks,
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
> Please clarify why these changes are needed, the changelog only lists one
> 'normal' severity bug and a number of changes with no bug referenced.
Ok, sure:
* Adding patch to prevent needless latex run when no bib-files are referenced
(Closes: #688558).
TeXstudio executes an additional 'l
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 13:11:51 +0100, Tom Jampen wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package texstudio:
>
Please clarify why these changes are needed, the changelog only lists
one 'normal'
Hi
Are there any issues? Anything I can clarify to successfully unblock texstudio?
Regards
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50d18a4a.7080...@cry
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package texstudio:
texstudio (2.3+debian-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Adding patch to prevent needless latex run when no bib-files are referenced
(Closes: #688558).
*
6 matches
Mail list logo
