Hi,
intrigeri wrote (27 Dec 2012 20:55:46 GMT) :
> (Trying to make Wheezy better.)
> Dmitry Smirnov wrote (15 Dec 2012 10:57:10 GMT) :
>> I don't need to -- the original bug reporter (#688574) was not aware
>> of similar cases. He had a perfect example of a problem and I just
>> had a misfortune
Hi Daniel!
(Trying to make Wheezy better.)
Dmitry Smirnov wrote (15 Dec 2012 10:57:10 GMT) :
> I don't need to -- the original bug reporter (#688574) was not aware
> of similar cases. He had a perfect example of a problem and I just
> had a misfortune to discover another case of similar crash.
T
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 07:37:50 intrigeri wrote:
> >
> > Waht would you do?
>
> If there was a bug I really wanted to see fixed in Wheezy, I would
> 1. talk to the maintainer and possibly 2. prepare an upload for t-p-u.
>
Thanks, we'll see how it goes. Now I'd prefer to leave it with maintainer.
Hi,
Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 22:40:05 GMT) :
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:30:14 intrigeri wrote:
>> Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 01:16:15 GMT) :
>> > There were no reply from maintainer in #688574 so perhaps it would
>> > be better to set Daniel as owner of this bug...
>>
>> Please do i
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:30:14 intrigeri wrote:
> Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 01:16:15 GMT) :
> > There were no reply from maintainer in #688574 so perhaps it would
> > be better to set Daniel as owner of this bug...
>
> Please do it if you feel it's useful.
Waht would you do?
>
> A full ne
Hi,
Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 01:16:15 GMT) :
> There were no reply from maintainer in #688574 so perhaps it would
> be better to set Daniel as owner of this bug...
Please do it if you feel it's useful.
A full new upstream version was uploaded to unstable since
then, so an update in test
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:04:23 intrigeri wrote:
> Ping?
>
There were no reply from maintainer in #688574 so perhaps it would be better
to set Daniel as owner of this bug...
IMHO even if fix is not implemented properly it is still prevent certain
crashes which can't be worse than what's in testin
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt wrote (21 Oct 2012 16:45:39 GMT) :
> On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 03:09 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> ++#define __USE_GNU
> My understanding was that code outside of the C library should never
> define __USE_GNU, as it's an internal implementation detail. The real
> problem appears
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #691115 [release.debian.org] unblock libdvdread/4.2.0+20120521-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
691115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCR
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 03:09 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Please unblock package 'libdvdread4'
>
> unblock libdvdread/4.2.0+20120521-3
>
> This update fix crashes (#688574).
+ #include
+ #include
+ #define _GNU_SOURCE
++#define __USE_GNU
My understanding was th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package 'libdvdread4'
unblock libdvdread/4.2.0+20120521-3
This update fix crashes (#688574).
Full diff is attached.
Thank you.
Regards,
Dmitry.
diff --git a/debian/chan
11 matches
Mail list logo
