Hi, all.
sorry, reply was late.
As Adam wrote, this bug is a problem which is unnecessary to Wheezy.
I dont re-open this bug. Thank you.
Nobuhiro
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 23:00 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>> intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2012 00:51:4
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2012 00:51:44 GMT) :
> Adam D. Barratt wrote (12 Nov 2012 17:13:53 GMT) :
>> Why is multi-arch support for this particular library important, at this
>> stage of the freeze? Neither of its reverse-dependencies are currently
>> m-a tagged, nor sound like applications one
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt wrote (12 Nov 2012 17:13:53 GMT) :
> Why is multi-arch support for this particular library important, at this
> stage of the freeze? Neither of its reverse-dependencies are currently
> m-a tagged, nor sound like applications one would particularly need to
> install for multiple
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #690611 [release.debian.org] unblock: gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
690611: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690611
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 11:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Please unblock package gtkhotkey.
> In 0.2.1-4 and 0.2.1-5, I supported multiarch.
Why is multi-arch support for this particular library important, at this
stage of the freeze? Neither of its reverse-depende
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package gtkhotkey.
In 0.2.1-4 and 0.2.1-5, I supported multiarch.
---
gtkhotkey (0.2.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Update debian/control.
- Add 'Pre-Depends: ${m
6 matches
Mail list logo
