On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 13:15 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 02:17 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 23:47 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote:
> > debin/gcc/patches/ directory in the Debian gcc-X.Y source package. This
[...]
> > s/debin/debian/ ;-)
>
> Oh, just fixed in git repo.
[
On 10/26/2012 02:17 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 23:47 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>> Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc
>
>
> Debian GCC maintainers kindly provide required documentation patches under
> debin/gcc/patches/ directory in the Debian gcc-X.Y source package. This
>
Hello,
> >> | DMUA removed now.[2]
> I guess Steffen somehow missed the memo? (*hint hint*)
:) I'll go for it when I am back with my key tonight. I hope you have all
played with Yixuan's nice BOINC (http://wiki.debian.org/BOINC) packages, too.
Cheers,
Steffen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On Oct 24, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:11 -0400, root wrote:
,
| >
| >> Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However
currently,
| >> neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just
drop DMUA
| >> field and ask my sponsor, S
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:11 -0400, root wrote:
> ,
> | >
> | >> Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However currently,
> | >> neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just drop DMUA
> | >> field and ask my sponsor, Steffen, to use the new DM permission
> | >> interfa
,
| >
| >> Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However currently,
| >> neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just drop DMUA
| >> field and ask my sponsor, Steffen, to use the new DM permission
| >> interface (after I become a DM).
| >
| > The DMUA field is in the
On 10/13/2012 11:46 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 13.10.2012 16:24, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>> 于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道:
>>> Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no obvious
>>> connection with the package?
>>
>> This is because Samuel did most of the packaging wor
On 13.10.2012 16:24, Guo Yixuan wrote:
于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道:
Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no
obvious
connection with the package?
This is because Samuel did most of the packaging work half a year
ago, and I just updated it to match current gc
于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote:
Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc
Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into
wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, gcj
and gnat)
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689726 [release.debian.org] unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689726
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote:
Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc
Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into
wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo,
gcj
and gnat) in manpages, info, html and pdf.
Why
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc
Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into
wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, gcj
and gnat) in
12 matches
Mail list logo
