Is there something missing to go further?
--
Yann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5134b10d.9060...@lagaule.org
On 12/28/2012 12:05 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (27 Dec 2012 22:02:54 GMT) :
On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
I'm absolutely not sure what is the best thing to do now:
1. unblock the embedded python-gnupg copy to the "current copy of
Wheezy's python-gnupg
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (27 Dec 2012 22:02:54 GMT) :
> On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> I'm absolutely not sure what is the best thing to do now:
>>
>> 1. unblock the embedded python-gnupg copy to the "current copy of
>> Wheezy's python-gnupg + small change that supposedly imp
On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 16:53:48 GMT) :
On 12/12/2012 03:41 PM, intrigeri wrote:
Which means we can now get back to why this update of an embedded
library should be unblocked. Why is this update needed? Is the
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 16:53:48 GMT) :
> On 12/12/2012 03:41 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> Which means we can now get back to why this update of an embedded
>> library should be unblocked. Why is this update needed? Is the version
>> embedded in testing / in
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #689147 [release.debian.org] unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689147
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 12/12/2012 03:41 PM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 11:50:25 GMT) :
Ok then we wait for an answer from secure-testing-team?
I think so.
I don't think I need to do somthing, do I?
I think you don't, now that I added them to the loop myself.
Which means we can
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 11:50:25 GMT) :
> Ok then we wait for an answer from secure-testing-team?
I think so.
> I don't think I need to do somthing, do I?
I think you don't, now that I added them to the loop myself.
Which means we can now get back to why this update of an embed
On 12/12/2012 11:40, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 07:57:30 GMT) :
On 12/12/2012 01:37 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Looks like this should be added to the embedded code copies list,
regardless of the minor diff:
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
This can also be
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 07:57:30 GMT) :
> On 12/12/2012 01:37 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>> Looks like this should be added to the embedded code copies list,
>> regardless of the minor diff:
>> https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
> This can also be in Gajim itself, and I'll do th
On 12/12/2012 01:37 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (14 Oct 2012 16:35:07 GMT) :
On 10/14/2012 06:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-gnupg.
right, but we have a small change in it for logging:
logger = logging.getLogger('gajim.c.gnupg')
Looks like th
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (14 Oct 2012 16:35:07 GMT) :
> On 10/14/2012 06:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-gnupg.
> right, but we have a small change in it for logging:
> logger = logging.getLogger('gajim.c.gnupg')
Looks like this should be added to the embedded code
On 01/12/2012 14:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 18:06:53 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packa
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 18:06:53 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> >
> >>Package: release.debian.org
> >>Severity: normal
> >>User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> >>Usertags:
I'll ask a debian developper to upload it as soon as you tell me it's ok
(or you prefer it to be uploaded now? )
Hi,
0.15.1-2 is now in unstable,
--
Yann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
On 10/14/2012 06:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Yann Leboulanger , 2012-10-14, 18:06:
- the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look
bugfix only. What's the potential for regression there?
gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged,
FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-
* Yann Leboulanger , 2012-10-14, 18:06:
- the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look bugfix
only. What's the potential for regression there?
gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged,
FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-gnupg.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gajim
A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and parti
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package gajim
>
> A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and particulary the bug #682598 [0]
> More
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gajim
A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and particulary the bug #682598 [0]
More information can be found in the Mail I sent to debian-release mailing
list: [1]
de
20 matches
Mail list logo
