Re: Bug#687779: Bug#679966: ksh: diff for NMU version 93u+-1.1

2012-10-23 Thread Oliver Kiddle
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > In my opinion, it would be > > better if the debian release goes out with either the old squeeze release > > (93s+20080202-1) or 93u+20120628-1 (which was only bug fixes). > > Well, I think the release team have already expressed that they are less > than happy wit

Re: Bug#687779: Bug#679966: ksh: diff for NMU version 93u+-1.1

2012-10-22 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:48:12PM +0200, Oliver Kiddle wrote: > On 13 Oct, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > > I've prepared an NMU for ksh (versioned as 93u+-1.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/00. Please feel free to tell me if I > > should delay it longer. > > While this addresses the direct is

Bug#687779: Bug#679966: ksh: diff for NMU version 93u+-1.1

2012-10-22 Thread Oliver Kiddle
On 13 Oct, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > I've prepared an NMU for ksh (versioned as 93u+-1.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/00. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. While this addresses the direct issue that bug #679966 concerns, the cd builtin was broken in various ways in t