On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:36:08PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
> > Please provide a description of whatever problem you think you are
> > seeing and contact the release team (who are responsible for bin
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:00:21AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Though looking at why this was done it's not clear to me why we're not
> doing this particular round of uploads for all arches...
I didn't get what you pointed at, but it was me who scheduled it. You
built the package with an old versio
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:00:21AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Though looking at why this was done it's not clear to me why we're not
> doing this particular round of uploads for all arches...
Because with the current buildd architecture you cannot get equal changelogs
across all architectures, eve
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:44:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 13:36 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > [1] After a binnmu, the version numbers and changelogs don't match
> > so dpkg refuses to install a package for both architectures at the
> > same time. https://lists.de
2012/6/19 Mark Brown :
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:13:06PM +0200, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
>
>> Recent binNMU of zlib1g on amd64 made it impossible to co-install it in a
>> multi-arch environment.
>
> What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
> Please provide a description
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:13:06PM +0200, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
> Recent binNMU of zlib1g on amd64 made it impossible to co-install it in a
> multi-arch environment.
What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
Please provide a description of whatever problem you think yo
6 matches
Mail list logo
