Niels Thykier (04/06/2012):
> The first results on openwalnut appears to be positive[1], so it is
> probably not going to be an issue. But if something fails I expect
> you (i.e. the maintainers of biosig4c++) to help solve the issue.
Still looking good. Just asked ftpmasters to decruft it.
Mra
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 14:27:12 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> someone has to...
That's at least arguable.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lis
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > again). but for upcoming upload of libcomedi will report first (may be
> > > today)
> > doh -- there is no need for transition with libcomedi seems to me --
> > just incremental change in API and soversion remains the same... in the
> > worst may b
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 13:23:57 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > uploaded fresh libguac -- it is in NEW -- will report transition bug
> > again). but for upcoming upload of libcomedi will report first (may be
> > today)
>
> doh -- there is
On 2012-06-04 19:11, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Thank you Niels,
>
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I am not entirely sure if this was implied or not in your sentence, but
>> we would prefer getting a transition bug before the package is uploaded
>> to sid.
>
> yes -- that is what
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> uploaded fresh libguac -- it is in NEW -- will report transition bug
> again). but for upcoming upload of libcomedi will report first (may be
> today)
doh -- there is no need for transition with libcomedi seems to me --
just incremental change in
Thank you Niels,
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am not entirely sure if this was implied or not in your sentence, but
> we would prefer getting a transition bug before the package is uploaded
> to sid.
yes -- that is what I meant (I have sinned twice btw -- just yesterday
uploaded
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 675968 + pending
Bug #675968 [release.debian.org] transition: biosig4c++
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
675968: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675968
D
tags 675968 + pending
thanks
On 2012-06-04 18:03, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> [...]
>
> Please pardon me for apparently missing an important advisory for not using
> experimental first...
Hi,
I am not entirely sure if this was implied or not in your sentence, but
we would prefer getting a tran
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Please pardon me for apparently missing an important advisory for not using
experimental first... Transition is tiny -- just 2 dependent packages on
libbiosig-dev packages (below). "Tra
10 matches
Mail list logo
