Hi,
Bertrand Marc (11/05/2012):
> It's fine with me. GNUnet 0.8 is not very useful anyway since it is
> not compatible with 0.9 and there are not many users left on the 0.8
> network.
libmicrohttpd migrated tonight, with a bunch of binNMUs. The old binary
stays in testing for the following packa
Le 11/05/2012 12:17, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Cyril Brulebois (11/05/2012):
Unless I hear objections, I'll probably schedule those âtomorrowâ.
BinNMUs for libmicrohttpd scheduled.
Mraw,
KiBi.
It's fine with me. GNUnet 0.8 is not very useful anyway since it is not
compatible with 0.9
Cyril Brulebois (11/05/2012):
> Unless I hear objections, I'll probably schedule those “tomorrow”.
BinNMUs for libmicrohttpd scheduled.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Cyril Brulebois (08/05/2012):
> You're supposed to check with us when it's OK to get your package
> uploaded, not tell us after that has heppened…
Since both libmicrohttpd & mysqlclient are entangled through gnunet, I
think we could start binNMUing libmicrohttpd's reverse dependencies; we
might r
Hi Bertrand.
Bertrand Marc (08/05/2012):
> I am filing this bug for the transition of the "libmicrohttpd"
> package.
>
> Upstream released a new version, bumping the ABI version (SONAME) from
> 5 to 10.
>
> Among the reverse deps, it may not be necessary to binNMU gnunet,
> since a new version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I am filing this bug for the transition of the "libmicrohttpd" package.
Upstream released a new version, bumping the ABI version (SONAME) from 5
to 10.
Among the
6 matches
Mail list logo
