On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 02:30:13PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Indeed. In any case, were the new version to be accepted in to the
> > release then the appropriate route would be via unstable, not direct
> > to t-p-u.
> Works for
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> * Ondřej Surý [2012-10-30 10:13]:
>> I can do a manual code review for debian-release team if they are interested.
>>
>> I concur with LaMont that we need latest 9.8.x branch to keep the
>> sanity of the maintainer.
>
> That is no probl
* Ondřej Surý [2012-10-30 10:13]:
> I can do a manual code review for debian-release team if they are interested.
>
> I concur with LaMont that we need latest 9.8.x branch to keep the
> sanity of the maintainer.
That is no problem for me but could we please get a 9.9 debian source
package somewh
* LaMont Jones [2012-10-29 21:38]:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Indeed. In any case, were the new version to be accepted in to the
> > release then the appropriate route would be via unstable, not direct
> > to t-p-u.
>
> Works for me. I'll toss 9.8.4 in
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:30 PM, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Indeed. In any case, were the new version to be accepted in to the
>> release then the appropriate route would be via unstable, not direct
>> to t-p-u.
>
> Works for me. I'll
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Indeed. In any case, were the new version to be accepted in to the
> release then the appropriate route would be via unstable, not direct
> to t-p-u.
Works for me. I'll toss 9.8.4 into sid. As for getting it into wheezy,
it'll ma
On 29.10.2012 16:45, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:48:04AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:10:55PM +0100, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> a bind 9.9 package would be great as the new upstream version
contains
> many improvements regarding DNSSEC. Is there an
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:48:04AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:10:55PM +0100, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> > a bind 9.9 package would be great as the new upstream version contains
> > many improvements regarding DNSSEC. Is there any progress on this or
> > does anyone ha
8 matches
Mail list logo
