Cyril Brulebois (12/05/2012):
> Almost everything is ready, and with a few age-days give the following
> result for a dry ryn: evolution binNMUs are currently prevented from
> migrating due to libical (FTBFS / #663624).
This is fixed. My hints should be OK once late binNMUs (previously
missed in
Hi,
you'll find below a little status update.
Michael Biebl (02/04/2012):
> for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
>
> clutter-1.0: 1.8.4 → 1.10.0
> cogl: 1.8.2 → 1.10.0
>
> cogl has a soname bump libcogl5 → libcogl9
>
> We need to do clutter and cogl at the same time, as
Adam D. Barratt (07/05/2012):
> Level 2 has now been scheduled.
Level 3 seems mostly happy, baring mips, so I've started looking into
scheduling level 4 (excluding mips for now).
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 10:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 02:23 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > On 05.05.2012 16:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 16:15 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > So I'd kindly ask you to binNMU clutter-gst, clutter-imcontext and
>
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 02:23 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 05.05.2012 16:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 16:15 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> On 05.05.2012 16:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 00:00 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> So I guess you can
On 05.05.2012 16:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 16:15 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 05.05.2012 16:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 00:00 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
So I guess you can schedule the first round of binNMUs, i.e.
clutter-gesture, cl
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 16:15 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 05.05.2012 16:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 00:00 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> So I guess you can schedule the first round of binNMUs, i.e.
> >> clutter-gesture, clutter-gst and clutter-imcontext.
[...]
> clut
On 05.05.2012 16:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 00:00 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I've uploaded cogl, clutter-1.0, clutter-gtk and mutter.
>>
>> So I guess you can schedule the first round of binNMUs, i.e.
>> clutter-gesture, clutter-gst and clutter-imcontext.
>>
>> As clutte
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 00:00 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I've uploaded cogl, clutter-1.0, clutter-gtk and mutter.
>
> So I guess you can schedule the first round of binNMUs, i.e.
> clutter-gesture, clutter-gst and clutter-imcontext.
>
> As clutter-1.0 has not been built everywhere yet, a dw is
On 02.05.2012 00:53, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> tag 666889 pending
> thanks
>
> Adam D. Barratt (01/05/2012):
>> If the tracker looks correct now, then I think we can get this started.
>
> From the discussion tonight on IRC, potential issues are:
> gnome-sushi
> eog-plugins
>
> and they can b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 666889 pending
Bug #666889 [release.debian.org] transition: GNOME 3.4: clutter/cogl
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666889: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
tag 666889 pending
thanks
Adam D. Barratt (01/05/2012):
> If the tracker looks correct now, then I think we can get this started.
From the discussion tonight on IRC, potential issues are:
gnome-sushi
eog-plugins
and they can be removed if needed.
Green light it is, then.
Mraw,
KiBi.
sig
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 16:29 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 30.04.2012 20:03, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 17:25 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> On 29.04.2012 17:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> for GNOME 3.4, we n
Hi Adam,
On 30.04.2012 20:03, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 17:25 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 29.04.2012 17:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
> [...]
Pa
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 17:25 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 29.04.2012 17:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
> > [...]
> >> Packages which need sourceful uploads:
> >> =
On 30.04.2012 20:09, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 17:25:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> The FTBFS on arm is something I wasn't aware of and seem to be caused by
>> recent changes in the X/GL packages, it seems.
>
> There were no recent changes to the X/GL packages ttbomk.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 17:25:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> The FTBFS on arm is something I wasn't aware of and seem to be caused by
> recent changes in the X/GL packages, it seems.
There were no recent changes to the X/GL packages ttbomk.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital s
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 17:25 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 29.04.2012 17:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
[...]
> >> Packages which can be binNMUed:
> >>
On 30.04.2012 17:25, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 29.04.2012 17:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Packages which can be binNMUed:
>>> ===
>>> gnome-shell
>>
>> Appears to FTBFS on arm{el,hf} currently.
>
> The FTBFS
On 29.04.2012 17:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
> [...]
>> Packages which need sourceful uploads:
>> ==
>> mutter (3.2.2-2 from exp)
>
> Will tha
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
[...]
> Packages which need sourceful uploads:
> ==
> mutter (3.2.2-2 from exp)
Will that resolve #669441?
> Packages which can be binNMUed:
>
Hi Adam,
On 28.04.2012 16:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Has anyone looked at the "unknown" packages on the tracker -
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/cogl.html - i.e. those which
> build-depend on clutter or cogl but don't have a runtime dependency?
> Are any / all of those also likely
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
>
> clutter-1.0: 1.8.4 → 1.10.0
> cogl: 1.8.2 → 1.10.0
>
> cogl has a soname bump libcogl5 → libcogl9
>
> We need to do clutter and cogl at the same time, as clutter uses cogl
>
On 15.04.2012 16:12, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02.04.2012 09:58, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
>
> We'd like to start with the transition as soon as possible so we can
> upload the remaining bits of GNOME 3.4 to unstable.
>
> Pleas
Hi,
On 02.04.2012 09:58, Michael Biebl wrote:
> for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
We'd like to start with the transition as soon as possible so we can
upload the remaining bits of GNOME 3.4 to unstable.
Please let us know when there is a free slot to do this transition
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
clutter-1.0: 1.8.4 → 1.10.0
cogl: 1.8.2 → 1.10.0
cogl has a soname bump libcogl5 → libcogl9
We need to do clutter and c
26 matches
Mail list logo
