Hello,
we're half-way done: exiv2 and its binNMUs migrated during the just
finished britney run (through just urgenting exiv2 and gexiv2)! Full
status below.
kibi@franck:~/britney$ dak ls exiv2 -a source -s testing,unstable
exiv2 | 0.23-1 | testing | source
exiv2 | 0.23-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 656829 by 671998
Bug #656829 [release.debian.org] transition: exiv2 - libexiv2-9 -> libexiv2-11
656829 was blocked by: 653919 669543
656829 was blocking: 650516
Added blocking bug(s) of 656829: 671998
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
block 656829 by 671998
thanks
Cyril Brulebois (01/05/2012):
> The plan now is: let's go! :)
Summary after some time spent on it:
- geeqie/sparc is still marked as Building; pinged the admin, might be
a dying build(d).
- gexiv2 needs decrufting: libgexiv2-0 libgexiv2-0-dbg have to go away;
Adam D. Barratt (07/05/2012):
> I've scheduled binNMUs for most of level 1 on the tracker, with the
> exception of geeqie which has a pre-existing FTBFS bug; setting that
> as a blocker.
FWIW, as mentioned on IRC: #669543 is being 0-day NMU'd as I write.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 656829 with 669543
Bug #656829 [release.debian.org] transition: exiv2 - libexiv2-9 -> libexiv2-11
656829 was blocked by: 653919
656829 was blocking: 650516
Added blocking bug(s) of 656829: 669543
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
block 656829 with 669543
thanks
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 23:48 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> David Paleino (27/04/2012):
> > I meant: what are the plans to start it?
>
> The plan now is: let's go! :)
I've scheduled binNMUs for most of level 1 on the tracker, with the
exception of geeqie which ha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 656829 pending
Bug #656829 [release.debian.org] transition: exiv2 - libexiv2-9 -> libexiv2-11
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
656829: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
tag 656829 pending
thanks
David Paleino (27/04/2012):
> I meant: what are the plans to start it?
The plan now is: let's go! :)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> David Paleino (27/04/2012):
>> what's the status of the exiv2 transition? It would really be nice
>> to have exiv2 0.22 in wheezy.
>
We don't know yet (tbh). The transition page indicates that this
transition has packages involved in other ongoing transitions (namely
boost1.49 and tiff4-symbo
On 04/27/2012 11:12 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> David Paleino (27/04/2012):
>>> what's the status of the exiv2 transition? It would really be
>>> nice to have exiv2 0.22 in wheezy.
>>
>
> We don't know yet (tbh). The transition page indicates that this
> transition has packages involved in othe
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:25:47 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> David Paleino (27/04/2012):
> > what's the status of the exiv2 transition? It would really be nice to have
> > exiv2 0.22 in wheezy.
>
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/exiv2.html says not started.
I meant: what are the pla
David Paleino (27/04/2012):
> what's the status of the exiv2 transition? It would really be nice to have
> exiv2 0.22 in wheezy.
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/exiv2.html says not started.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello people,
what's the status of the exiv2 transition? It would really be nice to have
exiv2 0.22 in wheezy.
Kindly,
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.
13 matches
Mail list logo
