On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> there are a few packages in common with glew and numpy transitions, so
> I'd appreciate your holding off a little bit more. glew looks almost
> ready, so we might clean the path shortly.
OK, thanks for the information.
> In the meanwhil
Hi,
Vincent Fourmond (23/02/2012):
> I've checked all packages that build-depend on imagemagick, and they
> all build fine excepted for cimg that is currently FTBS (see #652770).
>
> Are there any reasons to delay the imagemagick transition as of now?
> It should really go smoothly.
there a
Hello again,
I've checked all packages that build-depend on imagemagick, and they
all build fine excepted for cimg that is currently FTBS (see #652770).
Are there any reasons to delay the imagemagick transition as of now
? It should really go smoothly.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To UN
Hello,
I've rebuilt all the remaining packages (excluding ruby-rmagick and
python-magick, that were already checked) against the version of
imagemagick in experimental, and everything went fine, excepted for
cimg, that fails at the build-dep level:
[...]
The following packages have unmet depe
Jonathan Nieder (26/01/2012):
> Yes, the lack of release team ack usually indicates that
> they are busy working on other transitions. See
> http://bugs.debian.org/release.debian.org or
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/ for some details on those.
>
> If you would like to help them:
>
>
Hi,
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> is there be anything specific
> that prevents us from uploading the current imagemagick in
> experimental to unstable ?
Yes, the lack of release team ack usually indicates that
they are busy working on other transitions. See
htt
Hello,
It's been more than a month that we requested permission to proceed
with the new imagemagick transition; is there be anything specific
that prevents us from uploading the current imagemagick in
experimental to unstable ?
Thanks,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-r
Dear release Team,
Any news on the imagemagick transition ? Would it be OK to upload
the new version to unstable ?
pythonmagick reportedly builds and runs fine with the newer version,
so with both bindings fine, it should really be a binNMU-only
transition.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
8 matches
Mail list logo
