Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-04-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, I raised the bugs to RC with the upload to unstable (I thought some notification did happen since they were blocking this one) Feel free to drop some lines on debian-devel :) It is mostly built and installed everywhere  Cheers, Gianfranco Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Wed, 6 Apr, 20

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-04-06 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2016, 15:33 + schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > Hi, > > > > Ack. :) > > > > I don't let you change your mind now :) > uploaded on debomatic-amd64, and on unstable a few seconds ago. > > lets the *fun* start! > > BTW I added me and Tobias in uploaders list, as per pr

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-04-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >Ack. :) I don't let you change your mind now :) uploaded on debomatic-amd64, and on unstable a few seconds ago. lets the *fun* start! BTW I added me and Tobias in uploaders list, as per private mail exchange with the current maintainers. thanks! Gianfranco

Processed: Re: Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 650601: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650601 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-04-06 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 03/04/16 09:55, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > >> rename libpng16-tools to libpng-tools, >> merge libpng16-devtools with libpng-dev. >> >> If and when poeple will want to have a multiarch development package, we >> will split, patch and start >> a new transiti

Bug#650601: R: Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-04-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Ho dear Tobias and Emilio > Regarding libpng-config, I do not have a > complete list, but during the > rebuilds I > made a list of affected packages, but I faintly > remember > that there were at one-two others.  > They were leafpackages though, so no need > Also, I'm prepared to dedicated any

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-04-03 Thread Tobias Frost
On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:55:55 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: with an ftpmaster *really fast* accept we are > now in place and ready for the transition. >  > I think we are ready for the ack. >  > thanks, >  > Gianfranco >  I agree with Gianfranco, "NOW" would be a great time to start that adven

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-04-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, > rename libpng16-tools to libpng-tools, > merge libpng16-devtools with libpng-dev. > > If and when poeple will want to have a multiarch development package, we will > split, patch and start > a new transition against ~50 packages not against ~500. > > We are almost ready, there is no need

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-03-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
An alternative is to have a multiarch library, and a non-multiarch development package with the config script. to me it makes no real sense to split the config file into a separate package, specially because 1) it is in the same dev package on other linux distros 2) it was in the same dev packag

Re: Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-03-31 Thread Alastair McKinstry
On 31/03/2016 15:59, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > >> (that package has a script libpng-config in usr/bin that contains arch-dep >> information) >> e.g. >> >> "libdir="${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu"" > We shouldn't remove that file, I see it is used widely also by other distros. One sol

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-03-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >(that package has a script libpng-config in usr/bin that contains arch-dep >information) >e.g. > >"libdir="${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu"" We shouldn't remove that file, I see it is used widely also by other distros. Instead, we can patch packages failing in configure script and add the re

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-03-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >- The change that libbpng-dev only recommends libpng16-devtools will cause >some build failures, as several packages needs the devtool to be pulled in but >do not declare a dependency on this. > the rationale for the change is that libpng-dev is Multiarch: same, while devtools is providing

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-03-31 Thread Tobias Frost
> Hi Gianfranco, > > Of course they can B-D on libpng16-devtools (but requires several sourceful > uploads during the transition), but than we have that nasty SONAME back in the > B-depdencies... > Should we provide also a SONAME-neutral package name here? Ähm, we have already a Provides: libpng-d

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

2016-03-31 Thread Tobias Frost
Hi Gianfranco, I've just got a change to take a look at the new libpng package. A remark: - The change that libbpng-dev only recommends libpng16-devtools will cause some build failures, as several packages needs the devtool to be pulled in but do not declare a dependency on this. Of course they