Hi all,
Le dimanche 11 décembre 2011 17:25:41, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > the DLJ bundles were created because you are not allowed to re-distribute
> > the jdk packages from oracle. Did that change recently?
>
> I believe inside an organisat
* Matthias Klose:
> On 12/11/2011 01:07 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug,
>>
>> me too, for all the reasons Philipp noted.
>>
>> It's also trivial to download the fix
Florian Weimer writes:
> * Philipp Kern:
>> sun-java6 is sadly still a very high profile package. I won't go and
>> break all those installations which force sun-java6 over openjdk-6
>> locally, either in unattended installations or through other means.
> It's really unfortunate that most of th
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Matthias Klose wrote:
> the DLJ bundles were created because you are not allowed to re-distribute
> the jdk packages from oracle. Did that change recently?
I believe inside an organisation I can rebundle their bundles to my prefered
kind of bundle, that is, form of
On 12/11/2011 01:07 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug,
>
> me too, for all the reasons Philipp noted.
>
> It's also trivial to download the fixed jdk from oracle and build
Hi,
I forgot:
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Holger Levsen wrote:
> $ debdiff sun-java6_6.26-3.dsc sun-java6_6.29-1.dsc|diffstat
> debian/changelog |8
> debian/rules |6
> jdk-6u26-dlj-linux-amd64.bin |327520
> -- jdk-6
* Philipp Kern:
> sun-java6 is sadly still a very high profile package. I won't go and
> break all those installations which force sun-java6 over openjdk-6
> locally, either in unattended installations or through other means.
It's really unfortunate that most of those installations seem to need
Hi,
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug,
me too, for all the reasons Philipp noted.
It's also trivial to download the fixed jdk from oracle and
build a fixed package, so IMHO an announcement containing these i
Hi Moritz, hi all,
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 08:43:06PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Since openjdk-6 is fixed now, now would be a good time to remove
> sun-java6 from stable in the next point update?
sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug,
describing its impact to
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:47:53PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Moritz Mühlenhoff:
>
> > Florian, what's the status of openjdk6 for stable/oldstable?
>
> I've released the pending update for squeeze. lenny will eventually
> follow, and so will the pending updates for squeeze, but judging by
* Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> Florian, what's the status of openjdk6 for stable/oldstable?
I've released the pending update for squeeze. lenny will eventually
follow, and so will the pending updates for squeeze, but judging by my
past performance, it will take a while.
If someone else wants to work on
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:07:30AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Moritz Muehlenhoff:
>
> > As for stable/oldstable: I noticed that Red Hat provided packages for
> > update 29 for RHEL 4 (RHEL 5 onwards use OpenJDK):
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/463919/
>
> If anyone remembers the rationale beh
Hi
Von: Sylvestre Ledru [sylves...@debian.org]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Oktober 2011 11:34
>> As for stable/oldstable: I noticed that Red Hat provided packages for
>> update 29 for RHEL 4 (RHEL 5 onwards use OpenJDK):
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/463919/
> Well, I wonder how (if ?) they can do that..
Le vendredi 21 octobre 2011 à 08:41 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> > Hi Philipp,
> >
> > Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > > Or it's the removal of the package.
> >
> > we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable,
* Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> As for stable/oldstable: I noticed that Red Hat provided packages for
> update 29 for RHEL 4 (RHEL 5 onwards use OpenJDK):
> http://lwn.net/Articles/463919/
If anyone remembers the rationale behind the DLJ, perhaps they can
check if the current BCL matches our needs, too?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > Or it's the removal of the package.
>
> we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we are going to
> remove sun-java6 from (old)stable. But I do not have a stro
Hi Philipp,
Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> Or it's the removal of the package.
we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we are going to
remove sun-java6 from (old)stable. But I do not have a strong opinion on
that.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:28:02PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> What I'm wondering is if we tried to ask upstream whether they would be
> willing to extend the DLJ offer so we can keep security fixes for the
> sun-java6 version in stable coming in for the lifetime of this release,
> notwithstand
On mer., 2011-10-19 at 15:28 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> What I'm wondering is if we tried to ask upstream whether they would be
> willing to extend the DLJ offer so we can keep security fixes for the
> sun-java6 version in stable coming in for the lifetime of this release,
> notwithstanding th
On Wed, October 19, 2011 14:15, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/19/2011 02:09 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> Have we been in contact with Oracle upstream and explained that we are
>> eager to comply with their wish to move entirely to openjdk for our next
>> release, but have the problem that we have
On 10/19/2011 02:09 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Have we been in contact with Oracle upstream and explained that we are
> eager to comply with their wish to move entirely to openjdk for our next
> release, but have the problem that we have a stable release out in the
> field that people rely on? Ar
On Wed, October 19, 2011 12:50, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> CC debian release & security
>
> Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
>> Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
>>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> CC debian release & security
>
> Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
>> Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
>>
CC debian release & security
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
> Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
> with security fixes.
Well, that especially means that it is now
24 matches
Mail list logo
