Re: Bug#624382: transition: KDE SC 4.6

2011-05-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 27.05.2011 09:56, schrieb Modestas Vainius: >> * binNMU others (I wouldn't expect them to FTBFS): >> >> nmu networkmanagement_0.1+git20110422.810bc16-1 . ALL . -m "KDE SC 4.6 > > When binNMUing, you could Dep-Wait on kde-sc-dev-latest (>= 4:4.6). kde-sc- networkmanagement had a sourceful u

Bug#624382: transition: KDE SC 4.6

2011-05-27 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On ketvirtadienis 28 Balandis 2011 01:59:22 Modestas Vainius wrote: > I would like to ask for a slot to do the KDE SC 4.6 transition. It is > already somewhat overdue (with respect to 4.6.0 release upstream) so doing > it sooner (in a week or so) rather than later would be very appreciated.

Bug#624382: transition: KDE SC 4.6

2011-05-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:59:22 +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hello, > > I would like to ask for a slot to do the KDE SC 4.6 transition. It is already > somewhat overdue (

Bug#624382: transition: KDE SC 4.6

2011-04-28 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On ketvirtadienis 28 Balandis 2011 01:59:22 Modestas Vainius wrote: > It's not very clear to me (personally) what to do with kdebindings but IMHO > if possible, it's better to delay it sometime after this transition. This > ugly beast links the whole distro together. Just to note: even if

Bug#624382: transition: KDE SC 4.6

2011-04-27 Thread Modestas Vainius
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, I would like to ask for a slot to do the KDE SC 4.6 transition. It is already somewhat overdue (with respect to 4.6.0 release upstream) so doing it sooner (in a week or so) rather