On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:01:30PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Dominic Hargreaves, Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 01:16:04PM +0100 |=-
> > I wonder whether this is the time to give up with the perl 5.12
> > transition and make a start on the perl 5.14 one proper. I still think
> > that the best route w
-=| Dominic Hargreaves, Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 01:16:04PM +0100 |=-
> I wonder whether this is the time to give up with the perl 5.12
> transition and make a start on the perl 5.14 one proper. I still think
> that the best route would be to go via perl 5.12, so people have a
> chance to see deprecati
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 03:08:21PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> http://release.debian.org/transitions doesn't list all planned transitions.
> Some maintainers asked us to list their transition there, so that they have
> the list of affected packages and they start preparing their transition. It
> l
On 20/04/2011 14:16, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> So, here we are.
>
> I wouldn't mind getting initial packages prepared, to make sure there
> are no complete showstoppers for Debian, but we do have something of
> a problem in that there's only one experimental...
>
> I wonder whether this is the
So, here we are.
I wouldn't mind getting initial packages prepared, to make sure there
are no complete showstoppers for Debian, but we do have something of
a problem in that there's only one experimental...
I wonder whether this is the time to give up with the perl 5.12
transition and make a star
5 matches
Mail list logo
